Donate SIGN UP

Fighting for Abu Qatadas extradition to Jordan

Avatar Image
pdq1 | 14:54 Thu 11th Oct 2012 | News
12 Answers
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-19906595

Why do we want Jordan to grant him a pardon? I thought the idea was to get shot of him!

If he had been granted a pardon Jordan would no longer be interested in him and he could remain in the UK forever.
Gravatar

Answers

1 to 12 of 12rss feed

Best Answer

No best answer has yet been selected by pdq1. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.

For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
If he was granted a pardon there would be no need to present suspect evidence, obtained by torture, against him.
And if that was the case the courts here would probably allow his deportation.
Question Author
Yes but a pardon means he will be excused all charges against him by Jordan. He could then remain in Britain.
The idea is to be shot of him and stop him coming back. That a senior judge thinks the case against him doesn't appear to merit the charge , gives a clue as to why a pardon was suggested. We don't like the idea of evidence obtained by torture being admitted, either. But anything will do, provided the man gets to Jordan.
Question Author
But the only reason for extradition is that he has a case to answer in Jordan. If these cases are no longer justified why should they accept him back.
He wouldn't be extradited, he would be deported. But the result would be the same. He'd be out of our hair.
The evidence against him seems a hell of a lot weaker than that against Gary McKinnon.

Funny how people seem to think that judges are there not to follow the law but to reflect public opinion

Sometimes I wonder if they get confused between the High Court and Britains Got tallent
why do we give a rats ar5e what happens in Jordan. Just deport the nutter and be done with it.
Democracy is "government of, by and for the people".
Abraham Lincoln

Oh yeah !
Since when have we been a democracy? modeller, technically we don't even have a constitution - and Lincoln was American, as I am sure you are more than aware.
Precisely ! Democracy doesn't exist and never has . The concept is unworkable . Even a single definition doesn't exist there are hundreds.
Abraham Lincoln's is but one, albeit a famous one.
The same applies to the concepts of Justice ad fairness no two people will totally agree. So it is left to the judges and politicians to decide .
Abu Qatadas may still be here in 10 years time .
Lovers of referenda and democracy might look back to the original democracy, that of Athens. Everything there was decided by the mass vote but the vote was confined to citizens. Even the original democracy was not a democracy !

1 to 12 of 12rss feed

Do you know the answer?

Fighting for Abu Qatadas extradition to Jordan

Answer Question >>

Related Questions

Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.