Isn't It Nice To See Camilla Parker Bowled Taken To...

[sandyRoe]

...the busom of the people? It seems no time at all since she was villified as a marriage breaking adulteress.
She's just celebrated her 75th birthday.
Will you join me in wishing her a happy birthday?

[naomi24]

//They had an opportunity to marry each other before either of them married anyone else//

I don't think that's true. Virgins only required - and she had history.

[Ellipsis]

By that logic, they should never have dated in the first place.

[naomi24]

Dating isn't marriage. The baby machine that was to produce future monarchs needed to be unsullied.

[Peter Pedant]

Hmm - naomi as royal marriage broker
ma'am have you anyone in mind for Prince George

[Peter Pedant]

// "It can't have been easy for Diana dying so young and leaving her sons behind"
What on earth could that possibly mean?//

it means: that as the pillar under the Pont du Neuf Bridge hurtled towards them, in the fatal car, her final thought were "my poor babies, who will look after them now?"

[ laving aside: not that jerk of a father they have]

[naomi24]

PP, //it means: that as the pillar under the Pont du Neuf Bridge hurtled towards them, in the fatal car, her final thought were "my poor babies, who will look after them now?"

Wrong bridge. You forgot to google - but nevertheless, as tasteless as always.

[Canary42]

Isn’t it amazing how any criticism of Camilla brings out the Smear-Di Brigade in force. Either to create a smoke-screen or to promote the principle that two wrongs make a right.

Diana was too inexperienced to recognise just how dysfyunctional Charlie was. When asked on air if he loved her he professed not to know what that meant. What a dreadful thing to say in front of his newly-affianced to whom no doubt he had professed his love. She should have smelt a rat straight away.

Then when it comes to her infidelity, what was she supposed to do since Charlie was obviously too exhausted and too disinclined after tampon-duty to satisfy her.

[Stableford]

Amazing she's made it to 75 after all those fags.

[barry1010]

I like her

[Ellipsis]

> Dating isn't marriage. The baby machine that was to produce future monarchs needed to be unsullied.

OK, so as you describe it ...

1) Charles dated Camilla and had "romantic liaisons" (aka bonks) with her before either of them were married. He could not marry her because she had bonked somebody else before him.
2) Camilla then married APB and yet she and Charles continued said romantic liaisons.
3) Charles then married Diana (eight years later now) and he and Camilla continued laising (bonking)
4) Diana, virginal before Charles, produces William and Harry.
5) Years later, Charles and Diana divorce.
6) The same year they divorce, Diana dies horribly ...
7) A little while later, Charles then marries Camilla who he's always loved but could not marry ... until after a virgin had produced his children.

And you wonder why the Royal Family is, to use one of PP's words, a right royal foo???!!! Star crossed lovers my backside.

But still a happy birthday ...

[naomi24]

With a couple of further explanatory tweaks, that's about it, ellipsis.

[anneasquith]

Ah, the ‘ tampon’ saga.
I’ll never understand how anyone could take these two juveniles Seriously ever again .
Future king and queen .? Please .