Donate SIGN UP

Us Citizens Funding Immigration Into The Uk

Avatar Image
Canary42 | 15:43 Fri 19th Nov 2021 | News
32 Answers
It seems that out "Special Relationship" with the USA means that one of their millionaires (Kim Kardashian) can blithely fund the travel costs of immigrants into the UK where of course they become the responsibility of the UK taxpayers.

Since Kim is so concerned about them, why not fly them to her own country, the "land of the free".

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-59330365
Gravatar

Answers

21 to 32 of 32rss feed

First Previous 1 2

Best Answer

No best answer has yet been selected by Canary42. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.

For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
//NJ, they are a women's football team ages 13 to 19 and you have them altready married?//

I said in 5-10 years Danny.

//if they have got visas, then it's prctically irrelevant who paid/how their travel for them to come here was arranged isn't it?//

No it’s not. If they did not have the funds to get here they would not have arrived.

I’m sorry, but anybody believing this latest exercise in altruism (with other people’s money, natch) will cost the UK taxpayer nothing is somewhat deluded. These girls will need housing, feeding, educating, will almost certainly need medical attention of some sort. That’s just for starters.

I note that they were allowed into Pakistan and somehow finished up in Denmark. So why here as their final destination? I also note this is not a football team (eleven plus a couple of subs and a coach). There are 130 (one hundred and thirty) of them. They have nowhere to live. So where will they spend their first few nights and who will pay for that?

This country (and many of the people in it) has lost its marbles. It's bad enough having to accommodate those invading these shores by rubber boat. To invite others here unnecessarily is lunacy.
These are children who were in huge danger in Afghanistan. They were granted visa and reached these shores officially and by using the correct channels. Better they come here then be left in their homeland for the Taliban to deal with.
Why this 130 of them then. There are tens (if not hundreds) of thousands of children in such a position. Indeed it would be better that they are here rather than there - if we had the facilities and resources for them. But we haven't. There are people here in dire need and they are told they cannot be helped.
There must be hundreds of orphaned, abandoned or lost children who are probably in more danger. I'm talking very young, wouldn't it have been kinder to bring those children here to make them safe?
-- answer removed --
one must blame the government who gave them visas
Nice Fender. Good to see how you're willing to condemn a group of schoolchildren who have done absolutely nothing wrong. Why should they have the chance of a future eh?
but why here of all places Mozz. surely if they had landed in Pakistan that would have been a safe haven,
Think they would sooner come to the UK Emmie than Pakistan.
They probably think its safer on the Streets on London.
Yes to the sunlit meadows . You y not want to live here but clearly some do gulliver. For a socialist you don't appear very caring to the less fortunate
Maybe your secret ukip Farage supporter.
10.05 If I throw you a stick will you go away.

21 to 32 of 32rss feed

First Previous 1 2

Do you know the answer?

Us Citizens Funding Immigration Into The Uk

Answer Question >>

Related Questions

Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.