Donate SIGN UP

Lees And Falconio.

Avatar Image
malagabob | 04:41 Thu 11th Jun 2020 | ChatterBank
12 Answers
Anyone who watched the 4 part documentary. What conclusions have you come to.
Gravatar

Answers

1 to 12 of 12rss feed

Best Answer

No best answer has yet been selected by malagabob. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.

For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
Very odd and I don't believe Lees at all. Her behaviour, considering her boyfriend had just been murdered was appalling. Lots of conflicting evidence, but not enough to help Bradley.
Question Author
The Police set him ( Bradley ) up just to be able to gain dna swabs. Which stinks.
I thought it was very obvious that Murdoch had done it

The NWT police were obviously not up to the job and were easily misled ( misled themselves)

Joanne Lees was a bit strange but that doesnt mean that what she said wasnt true ( oops 2le neg there) - and there was no sign of Falconio ever - er well wasnt there a great blood stain . Did they test it?

M said to another con. "I know how to conceal a body - you hide it in a storm drain" and all the storm drains ( along 1000 mi) were searched. In the prog it came out as a mudpool beside the road after a downpour

M also apparently ( and this damned him to the WHOLE of Oz) pointed at the viddie of the fella at the service station and said: "that is not me" - no mate, that is not me

and everyone in Oz knew he had done it

I wondered about the previous charge 'just to get DNA' - I thought there were rules about partitioning this sort of thing

he was charged - and then disappeared - which you dont do usually

and he = = = = shot his dog


oh and Joanne Lees
in 2017 found she had a half sister - half her age - as her father had dallied outside the marriage bed
horrible little female Bovine if you ask me.
Only watched one and a half episodes.
In my opinion her demeanour and need to control were most odd. I feel she knows more than she has told.
Big sticking point for me though is Murdoch’s DNA on her t shirt.
A complex situation.
even I - tolerant Peter that is! - wondered about:
"well here is the press conference you agreed to Joanne"

joanne for it was she: I only agreed if there were no press present!

about 50 ockers: "jeez what did that shy-ler just say - no press? we gotta live and we live by copy. Only a pom would come with that sh.... etc etc"
I have some great ideas on what happened ,can’t wait on the book myself .
I've only seen the first two episodes .... but I don't like Lees one bit. Eleven days after the event she asked the media to respect her privacy and allow her to get on with her life. Get on with her life? Eleven days after her own terrifying ordeal and her boyfriend presumably murdered? A speedy recovery!!
Question Author
Apparently ( Falconio ) he had mentioned to another person how many people had faked their own deaths to claim insurance. No payouts yet I believe as no death has been proved.
Plus apparently Bradley’s dog was alive when he is supposed to have committed the crime. Lees said she ran into the desert for 10 minutes. But it was proved she hid only 35 mtrs from the road. The dog would have found her in 30 seconds.
// But it was proved she hid only 35 mtrs from the road. The dog would have found her in 30 seconds.//

she said the dog sniffed around her but didnt 'hit' - in fact M kept it to bite non payers in drug deals so perhaps the mutt thought it was above its pay grade. And the trackers DID find a fresh dead dog. (M: "you shoot the dog and just get another one" - the Beast!)

and there was no track sign of Falconio - er the blood? -

we dont see the stuff on the floor and the two truckers who picked her up were phazed by the q we didnt hear
Did you think she was pretending or had put the uffs on herself?

No mate - she was as scared as could be - we saw she was in real trouble and picked her up. we cut off the tapes and then though we better keep them so we did - they all said we had done everything OK

I felt sorry for them as they werent expecting that slant

and they did a mock up splatter test and they way they did it =
woo-hoo she would have been splattered with blood and guts !

The appeals were so groundless that they applied to the judge to declare that old info really was NEW info. so there were two special appeals which went over old stuff pretending it was new
So, what do you think happened? She killed him and hid his body...where?

1 to 12 of 12rss feed

Do you know the answer?

Lees And Falconio.

Answer Question >>

Related Questions

Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.