Donate SIGN UP
Gravatar

Answers

21 to 38 of 38rss feed

First Previous 1 2

Best Answer

No best answer has yet been selected by anotheoldgit. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.

For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
I wouldn't dream of going. Even before the latest warnings.
yes of course, another un safe tish h0le to tick off the list.
No, travel agents should not compensate holidaymakers, because the events in Jamaica are outside their control - like bad weather.
Think I would feel safer in Jamacia than in London.
TBH you'd have to be radio to go there even before this latest state of affairs, it ain't much of a holiday if you have to be cocooned in a "resort" because the country is up to it's gills in criminal scum.
I think 10cc released Dreadlock Holiday in about 1975. The song, rather TICly, portrays the potential problems of holidaying in Jamaica 4 decades ago.
But millions of people do go because if you are cocooned in your resort (and that's what lots of tourists do) it's not a tish hole it's near paradise if you're into that kind of beach holiday.
TTT

Actually, it not as dangerous as you might think. I've been several time, and I've also travelled around Mexico and Colombia - both places with fearsome reputations. The problem is, unless you've been to a place (and you're reliant on news pieces), it's impossible to assess their threat levels.

Jamaica as a huge gun problem, but like (say) New York, you have to consciously go to the very roughest areas (Brooklyn and the Bronx) to encounter anything that you might see on the news.
SP, I'm going by the warnings of locals, basically they say don't go anywhere outside the resorts.
The army presence and practical lockdown of paying customers is just a traditional Jamaican greeting then.

Phew, what a relief.
gulliver1
Think I would feel safer in Jamacia than in London.


Why?
If I may, maybe because so many of the gangsters have found their way to the UK, enriching our lives no end.
I don't see the point of travelling around the world to be restricted to a complex. Hardly new experiences or likely to broaden the mind. If it's not safe to go see the community, choose somewhere else to go.

Sounds like, unless folk were told they could mingle with the locals then they've not lost anything from the holiday.
No, they shouldn't offer refunds.
OG it really depends on what you want from a holiday and we are all different. If you want to lie on palm fringed beaches swimming in turquoise seas and drinking rum punches all day then these AI type breaks are great.
Not sure why, but many people get some sort of buzz by visiting these countries.I recon they think it wont happen to them.They only seem happy if Kate Aide is on the same flight :-)
Question Author
sp1814

/// unless you've been to a place (and you're reliant on news pieces), it's impossible to assess their threat levels. ///

For their government to impose a State of Emergency, one doesn't need to go there to assess what the threat level is.

I don't understand anyone going half way round the world to spend it in a gated man made resort. They make me laugh when they come back home and say how wonderful Jamaica or wherever they have been is, how do they know, they haven't seen it? All they have seen is the plastic resort.

21 to 38 of 38rss feed

First Previous 1 2

Do you know the answer?

For The Safety Of Their Customers Should British Travel Firms Offer A Full Refund On Holidays Book For Jamaica?

Answer Question >>

Related Questions

Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.