Donate SIGN UP

Freedom Of Speech

Avatar Image
Khandro | 11:32 Thu 24th Nov 2016 | News
95 Answers
The final statement of Geert Wilders at his trial;
https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/9404/wilders-trial-closing-statement
Gravatar

Answers

81 to 95 of 95rss feed

First Previous 2 3 4 5

Best Answer

No best answer has yet been selected by Khandro. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.

For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
^ I meant county town of Wiltshire ;o)

Incidentally,Trowbridge is twinned to Oujda in Morocco and was the first town in the UK to form a partnership with a Muslim Arab country!
Bit late and struggling to type (blue wheel appears with a ding-dong noise and it all did) but I have read Geert's speech and it strikes me as perfectly reasonable. He is saying what he disagrees with and does not want for his country. I have to be short and I may not be able to get back to answer. :(
^^^ 'it all died' grrrr.
The election in March looks set to be very close. One wonders, with interest, if Wilders' PVV party prevails, whether he will renege on some of his pledges.

Much has been said on here and in the media, regarding the numerous U-turns by Trump. Will Wilders ban the Koran for example? Something tells me that he means business.

As he has stated in the past, it is not Muslims he dislikes, it is Islam itself which of course means 'submission'.

Wilders is understandably irked and he should be free to express his desire for the country that he is proud of, not to submit to a totalitarian theology.
Love Wilders, but DON'T ban him to ban the Koran, AgChristie, even though it meets all the standards for hate speech under Dutch (or any other hate speech) law. Ought to be compulsory for non-Muslims to read it and see the bile spilt out page after page against (more or less in order) Jews, Chjristians and polytheists, then anyone else who doesn't accept the teachings of the Prophet.

Select a horse charity for you, Jourdain.
I mean I have selected on Jourdain's behalf.
V_e > even though it meets all the standards for hate speech under Dutch (or any other hate speech) law.

By comparison, Wilders' supposed transgression shouldn't even amount to a slap on the wrist!
v-e :0)
^^ Seems that by the time I am heading for bed, my computer will allow me to type. Fed up of all this. :( ''night.
Question Author
Choosing at random one of the many hate speeches in the Koran;
47:4 Behead and slaughter the unbelievers; take others captive.

When you meet the unbelievers, (Jews and Christians) smite their necks,

Should those distributing this book be prosecuted for spreading racial hatred and incitement to violence, just as anyone else would be found peddling literature containing similar categorical statements?
Should the Koran, in fact be a banned book?
Khandro > Should the Koran, in fact be a banned book?

Good question and one that a lot of people would agree that it should. However, most people are handicapped in that they are the Tommy Robinson's of this world i.e people of limited influence.

This is why the likes of Wilders deserves respect and courage to tackle a serious problem in the face of a considerable threat to his own welfare.

Of course, the Koran is a religious holy book and to ban it would be unthinkable in most ruling elites. Mustn't cause offence must we despite the hateful sentiments contained within.
Question Author
Oh boy! would that be something, - a private individual (with deep pockets) taking out a prosecution of an individual for distributing the Koran as a book that incites racial hatred and violence, and hiring the services of a top-fight British barrister to prosecute?
It would be cause celebre of the century.
Ahhh, but dream on Khandro.
Question Author
^^ Witnesses for the prosecution; Douglas Murray, Hamad Abdel-Samad and vetuste_ennemi.
^ and our fellow AB'er could lead the v_e Day celebrations once again! ;o)

81 to 95 of 95rss feed

First Previous 2 3 4 5

Do you know the answer?

Freedom Of Speech

Answer Question >>