Gaming1 min ago
What Happenned Here Then?
20 Answers
http://
Surely it's not possible to commit nastiness under the influence of the FBWD!
Surely it's not possible to commit nastiness under the influence of the FBWD!
Answers
1 to 20 of 20
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by ToraToraTora. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
What does FBWD stand for TTT?
From a quick google it appears that it stands for "facebooking while drunk"...
... which feels vaguely related to your recent posting style.
I don't think anyone argues there are no negative effects to cannabis, especially prolonged useage. This case is obviously not a 1:1 of "had a joint", "killed some people". There's a lot going on here.
From a quick google it appears that it stands for "facebooking while drunk"...
... which feels vaguely related to your recent posting style.
I don't think anyone argues there are no negative effects to cannabis, especially prolonged useage. This case is obviously not a 1:1 of "had a joint", "killed some people". There's a lot going on here.
Blimey. That's a lot of work. Glad you saved time by abbreviating it.
Did you give yourself a nickname at school too? :)
There is a trend towards imagining no harm comes from weed usage, and it's just a slightly unexamined position to hold.
Should it be legal? I think it's already accessible, so maybe making it "legal" would at least keep the money out of criminal pockets - and line HMRC's a bit more.
No one is going to be able to smoke it in a pub, club, or a public space - so it shouldn't be too much of a nuisance.
The only issue is the long term psychological damage it can do. Paranoia, depression and so on are regularly linked to prolonged weed usage - usually in men in their 40s, long after they've given it up.
We're hardly set for dealing with the luxury of mental illness currently, let along if we cause a epidemic in 20 year's time.
Did you give yourself a nickname at school too? :)
There is a trend towards imagining no harm comes from weed usage, and it's just a slightly unexamined position to hold.
Should it be legal? I think it's already accessible, so maybe making it "legal" would at least keep the money out of criminal pockets - and line HMRC's a bit more.
No one is going to be able to smoke it in a pub, club, or a public space - so it shouldn't be too much of a nuisance.
The only issue is the long term psychological damage it can do. Paranoia, depression and so on are regularly linked to prolonged weed usage - usually in men in their 40s, long after they've given it up.
We're hardly set for dealing with the luxury of mental illness currently, let along if we cause a epidemic in 20 year's time.
Spot on Ed
//The only issue is the long term psychological damage it can do. Paranoia, depression and so on are regularly linked to prolonged weed usage - usually in men in their 40s, long after they've given it up.
We're hardly set for dealing with the luxury of mental illness currently, let along if we cause a epidemic in 20 year's time.//
I agree. I will save that one for a later date.
//The only issue is the long term psychological damage it can do. Paranoia, depression and so on are regularly linked to prolonged weed usage - usually in men in their 40s, long after they've given it up.
We're hardly set for dealing with the luxury of mental illness currently, let along if we cause a epidemic in 20 year's time.//
I agree. I will save that one for a later date.
1 to 20 of 20
