Donate SIGN UP

Is This Why Many Say They Believe ?

Avatar Image
modeller | 11:16 Tue 22nd Apr 2014 | Religion & Spirituality
56 Answers
I was talking to a Theist friend of mine who said that he was a Theist not because he believed , in general terms he didn't , but rather it was better than the alternative. He said he Needed to believe in something outside himself and the known universe. He said without religion, life was a void.
Gravatar

Answers

21 to 40 of 56rss feed

First Previous 1 2 3 Next Last

Best Answer

No best answer has yet been selected by modeller. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.

For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
An no, the OP need not be related to Pascal's Wager. As indicated it is viable simply as a preference between options to believe/disbelieve.
The OP isn't Pascal's Wager exactly, but Ed's reply was.
When it comes to comparative religion better to think that each faith, in its own way, reflects elements of the same truth in the same way that water, silver or glass, in their own ways, reflect light from the same sun.
If I'm wrong and there is a god, he'll know me well enough to make the right choice. Honesty is better than superficial brown-nosing. Isn't it?
Jaclyn Glenn witters on for almost 6 minutes failing to give a reasoned argument at the start because she compares a situation she can and tells us she has tested with one she can not (at least in her lifetime) and presumably thinks she has made a point.

She then changes to subject to why she thinks God & Heaven do not exist, which is a different question, and points out different folk believe different things. Ok then believe them all if you wish.
It mightn't have been the most coherent argument ever, but the point about "Which religion to bet for?" is an entirely valid one, for Pascal's wager relies on there being only two choices: My God, or no God at all. And there just are not, but the Wager never seems to apply for people who are Christian betting against Islam, or Jews refusing to dabble in Hinduism on the off-chance, etc.
Be nice if people would leave us Christians alone for a bit. I don't do harm to others and neither do my friends at church. I would like to think that we do some good. A little grace and understanding, tolerance and even appreciation of the good works that so many in all denominations do might be, even grudgingly, be the mark of adulthood.
Who's attacking anyone?

Another problem with Pascal's Wager is that as soon as you start extending it to multiple religions you end up following none of them, really, as most religions contain the "you should follow this religion only" clause. So you have to pick one, just one, and then you end up risking losing the bet anyway.

The only way to play the "game" safely is to take a decision to follow a religion, or not, because you honestly and genuinely believe it to be the correct one. Any amount of intellectual dishonesty about religious belief is surely going to be no more likely to lead to eternal salvation than honestly and truly not believing at all.
//Is this why many say they believe//

Let take some fresh air! How refreshing after one’s being in a stuffy room! But even in the wide open spaces, pollution is a major problem today.

Why do I say that, well some death-dealing pollutants of this world’s “air” are not easily detected, even as such contaminants of the literal air as carbon monoxide are odorless and tasteless.

The danger, then, is that you may not detect the ‘deadly fumes.
So, you need to be alert that is not be led into a death trap by this world’s permissive believe attitudes.

Because it from “the ruler of this world. (John 12:31)

It is everywhere in human society. If we breathe it in, you begin to adopt its attitudes.

Its aims,is death dealing for you and me.

See if you can see it in this passage scripture Proverbs 5:3-14.

I know my alternative.
But they are all right Jim. There is the paradox.
Jayne, ;o)

Modeller, // …he was a Theist not because he believed , in general terms he didn't , but rather it was better than the alternative. He said he Needed to believe in something outside himself and the known universe.//

That makes no sense. Just what does he believe?

Pascal's Wager - one of the daftest, most ill-conceived ideas ever proposed. The omniscient God of Abraham knows the secrets of all hearts - allegedly. Therefore, it stands to reason that no matter what sneaky tactic is utilised to attempt to cheat him - and death - it's not going to work. He's got it sussed. Plan B anyone?
It's been pointed out numerous times, and by better people than me, that all religions cannot be right simultaneously because they often contradict each other. Even the ones with a huge overlap disagree on major issues. Jesus was a false prophet (Jews) or a true prophet (Islam) or the Son of God (Christians), and this is a highly non-trivial disagreement, and one of several between the three Abrahmic faiths.

That, and as Naomi pointed out God's ability to see your true purpose, shows that Pascal's Wager is necessarily lost unless belief is genuine, rather than for convenience.
They only seem to contradict each other, but honestly, one is like a wave, whilst the other is clearly a particle.
Question Author
I can't comment on all the posts but I can put a bit of meat on my OP .

My friend is a Christian . He is C of E. He does go to a Free Church run by a Baptist Minister . He does go to the discussion groups, chaired by the BM, which covers subjects like, marriage and divorce , telepathy, second sight, ghosts, are miracles and prayers ever proved ? Does a belief have a value even if it can never be proved.? What can be accepted as Proof anyway ?

It was on these last two questions that he said he needed the crutch of a religious belief despite his doubts.
The crucial point raised by Naomi's, err, JJ's, dammit, whoever's argument is that arbitrary beliefs have consequences, among them compromising one's own ability to reason and grasp the true nature of reality . . . all for the sake of a preferred delusion. If the only criteria one has for believing is that it simply feels right then it's just as likely you've fallen head first into the devils trap, which is . . . religion.
^^ aka plan B? :o)
Before christianity was invented everybody must have been rooting for the wrong god. We don't have any evidence that the right god has turned up or will turn up, the odds are heavily against it happening soon, given that he hasn't managed the to turn up yet. So Pascal's wager isn't even just a philosphical party trick, it is pointless and silly.
//We don't have any evidence that the right god has turned up//

If the bible is our guide, we have evidence that 'it' most certainly hasn't!
Quite, Naomi and since we don't know whether there will be a heaven or even if we will want to go to it (hell might be a better option) then perhaps Pascals wager is not so clever after all.
//He said without religion, life was a void.//

The church goes to great lengths to reinforce this notion. You are born a worthless sinner and only though The Lord can you become something worthy.

Indeed, for a very long time, and in some places, still to this day, the church will make sure your life is absolutely null and void if you choose not to believe.

21 to 40 of 56rss feed

First Previous 1 2 3 Next Last

Do you know the answer?

Is This Why Many Say They Believe ?

Answer Question >>