Crosswords0 min ago
Naked.
44 Answers
Is it really true that a male Muslim must kill himself if he sees a naked woman other than from his immediate family?
If it is, does this practice count for followers living in western countries? I mean, it is just about impossible to go through one's life without at least catching a glimpse of a streaker.
If it is, does this practice count for followers living in western countries? I mean, it is just about impossible to go through one's life without at least catching a glimpse of a streaker.
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by wildwood. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
ChuckFickens - “... [Keyplus] always come across as one of the more well spoken and rational posters on this site (you may not agree with what he says, but I've never seen him be nasty or rude)”
Even though you've been a member of AB since 2008, you clearly haven't been reading the threads where KP has 'lost it' with me and others. I have to say that lately he's reigned in his apparent lunacy (with me at least) but it was not so long ago that he was accusing me and others of being drug addicts because we didn't agree with his world-view. Over the years he has also repeatedly asked me to meet him and his 'friends' face to face so that we could discuss the finer points of Islam...
No offence Chuck, but KP has been anything but rational in his debates with me and others.
Even though you've been a member of AB since 2008, you clearly haven't been reading the threads where KP has 'lost it' with me and others. I have to say that lately he's reigned in his apparent lunacy (with me at least) but it was not so long ago that he was accusing me and others of being drug addicts because we didn't agree with his world-view. Over the years he has also repeatedly asked me to meet him and his 'friends' face to face so that we could discuss the finer points of Islam...
No offence Chuck, but KP has been anything but rational in his debates with me and others.
it is quite possible that somewhere in the world in some splitter sect of islam, that this could be true, even today.
i suspect it might stem from the harems of old, where if perhaps a guard or servant cast eyes on the body of the wives and concubines in the sanctum, then "suicide" was quickly "arranged".
i suspect it might stem from the harems of old, where if perhaps a guard or servant cast eyes on the body of the wives and concubines in the sanctum, then "suicide" was quickly "arranged".
Perhaps CHUCK FICKEN’s rationality does go beyond his nose unlike others here and for that reason may be he understood me more. But I know what few people’s worry is here. How come a person who believes in a religion could be called “rational”.
I will not touch upon all of the other allegations here about me as I know most of my posts are “responsive” and in simple English “reaction” and not “action”. Then of course it shows once again that few people just can’t digest someone saying something nice about me.
I will not touch upon all of the other allegations here about me as I know most of my posts are “responsive” and in simple English “reaction” and not “action”. Then of course it shows once again that few people just can’t digest someone saying something nice about me.
Okay, here's one from Thursday, 20th May 2011 at 10:44am:
Keyplus - "One more thing, ignore my little BIRDIE 1971 posts as he is a drug addict or dementia patient as you may notice from his posts. Because even after so many time I have given him all the answers to his question but still after more than three years he keeps on posting long, senseless posts..."
Nice.
Keyplus - "One more thing, ignore my little BIRDIE 1971 posts as he is a drug addict or dementia patient as you may notice from his posts. Because even after so many time I have given him all the answers to his question but still after more than three years he keeps on posting long, senseless posts..."
Nice.
And another one from Thursday, 14th October 2011 at 18:02:
http://www.theanswerb...2.html#answer-5268342
Keyplus (to Naomi) - "Have you stopped taking drugs? Just simple yes or no please."
Pathetic.
http://www.theanswerb...2.html#answer-5268342
Keyplus (to Naomi) - "Have you stopped taking drugs? Just simple yes or no please."
Pathetic.
OK, If you have decided to open old pages then lets analyse this.
Birdi – Your own post above tells very clearly why I said what you claim I said. Perhaps read once again and tell me why I called you a drug addict. And for that same reason when time after time you pretended that I do not answer your questions, I asked you for a face to face debate. But while doing that I did say that at a place of your choice, at a time of your choice and among the people of your choice. But you claimed (above) that I asked you to see me and my friends. And how cleverly you put “friends” between inverted comas to emphasize on something YOU added.
Naomi – Now lets talk about the thread where (allegedly) I asked Naomi if she had stopped taking drugs. Again out of context. Here is the extract from that post my little birdie referred to on Thursday 14th October 2010,
/////Few question just cannot be answered by simple “yes” or “no” and I agree with what others said in this regard. Anyone who does not agree with that just answer my question but just in simple “yes” or “no”. Have you stopped taking drugs? Just simple yes or no please./////
Now anyone who can read English can see that it had nothing to do with Naomi (or else click on that thread and see) but a general but of course Naomi likes putting her name on anything that can give her importance.
Finally, perhaps CHUCK FICKENS will not return to this thread but I believe he can read English and context of a post better than others and most importantly he does not TWIST the words.
Ummmm – I bet you would still say same thing even after reading this.
Birdi – Your own post above tells very clearly why I said what you claim I said. Perhaps read once again and tell me why I called you a drug addict. And for that same reason when time after time you pretended that I do not answer your questions, I asked you for a face to face debate. But while doing that I did say that at a place of your choice, at a time of your choice and among the people of your choice. But you claimed (above) that I asked you to see me and my friends. And how cleverly you put “friends” between inverted comas to emphasize on something YOU added.
Naomi – Now lets talk about the thread where (allegedly) I asked Naomi if she had stopped taking drugs. Again out of context. Here is the extract from that post my little birdie referred to on Thursday 14th October 2010,
/////Few question just cannot be answered by simple “yes” or “no” and I agree with what others said in this regard. Anyone who does not agree with that just answer my question but just in simple “yes” or “no”. Have you stopped taking drugs? Just simple yes or no please./////
Now anyone who can read English can see that it had nothing to do with Naomi (or else click on that thread and see) but a general but of course Naomi likes putting her name on anything that can give her importance.
Finally, perhaps CHUCK FICKENS will not return to this thread but I believe he can read English and context of a post better than others and most importantly he does not TWIST the words.
Ummmm – I bet you would still say same thing even after reading this.
