Mikey4444 - “...[Tommy Robinson is] an ex-Member of the BNP, and founder Member of another racist organisation the EDL. He was convicted of using threatening, abusive or insulting behaviour, in 2010...”
Etc.
Tommy Robinson, surprisingly, is also well versed in the contents of the Koran. He has studied the Koran and can quote passages with the best of them. He understands that Islam is a wicked and dangerous ideology. He tells it like it is – Islam is a violent, intolerant, misogynistic, murderous, vile, death-cult.
And your criticism of him rests upon his convictions for common assault and monetary impropriety? So let me get this straight – you're saying that we shouldn't listen to Tommy Robinson because he has criminal convictions? You're saying that a person with any sort of criminal conviction is ineligible to comment on matters relating to religion and belief? You're saying that we should trash everything said by people who have done immoral and demonstrably illegal acts? Correct me if I'm wrong here but you're suggesting that only those people with 'untainted' characters should be able to freely comment on matters of faith and belief?
That being so, by your own rationale, you should condemn Mohammed. He was a violent, murderous, thief and a paedophile. By our modern standards his actions and words are utterly appalling. And yet you see fit to accuse someone opposed to Mohammed's vile outpourings as being unfit to speak about such things because they have criminal convictions.
Extraordinary indeed.