Donate SIGN UP

Treaty of Urga.

Avatar Image
123everton | 00:00 Thu 14th Aug 2008 | History
2 Answers
Is the treaty of Urga enough to qualfy Tibetan claims of independence?
Or is there more?
Gravatar

Answers

1 to 2 of 2rss feed

Best Answer

No best answer has yet been selected by 123everton. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.

For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
I believe the Fact that Tibetans have their own Traditional Lands, their Own Customs and Languages, is all that should be required for them to have their own Nation if that is what the Majority of the Population desires.
Neither the Chinese nor any Other national Culture has any God-Given Right to wrest their Land from them. Only by Might has this Happened and Might does Not Equal Right.
Question Author
The whole of China's like that look at Yunnan (as one) for instance, there are even numerous variations of the same languages they even have a type of recieved pronounciation for the Mandarin spoken on state TV.
What you speak of are sentiments not legality, I'm not looking for rhetoric I'm seeking historical facts that back up the claims of Tibetan independence, I've asked on 3 different threads and yours is the first attempt at an answer.
To try and utilise an analogy in order to make a point what if Cornwall (has it's own flag) decided to leave the U.K? They have their own language and their own customs and their own defined boundaries of land on what basis could thry proclaim indepence legally?
Is "Free Tibet!" actually an example of wanting a "Passport To Pimlico"?

1 to 2 of 2rss feed

Do you know the answer?

Treaty of Urga.

Answer Question >>

Related Questions

Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.