Donate SIGN UP

Brazil Olympics

Avatar Image
Bazile | 12:16 Fri 05th Aug 2016 | News
25 Answers

Should Brazil be spending 12 Billion pounds hosting such an event like the olympic games ; when it has it's rivers flowing with sewage , amongst other things

http://www.cnbc.com/2016/08/04/rio-olympics-2016-economists-question-wisdom-of-hosting-olympics.html
Gravatar

Answers

1 to 20 of 25rss feed

1 2 Next Last

Best Answer

No best answer has yet been selected by Bazile. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.

For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
No the whole, now money obsessed event should discontinued.

Who cares who gets what gong?

does seem morally wrong
No, they should be spending the money on it's infrastructure. The health service, sky high crime, unemployment, mass poverty etc..

Bulldozing a few favelas, a quick spit and shine and moving crime out of the medias eye for the duration of the Olympics is not just not enough.
How can anyone justify such spending on something little more than a folly
It's not just this Olympics, the decision to allow Russia to field one of the largest teams despite government organised drug taking and faking of test results has made a mockery of the Olympic ideal.
The only way this should have been dealt with was by a total ban on any Russian participation in international sport not just the Olympics.
This has just proved that it is all about money and not on sporting excellence. The rot set in when professional athletes were allowed to compete, it used to be amateurs only.
But then of course the USSR simply enrolled all it's competitors in the army and gave them unlimited time off to compete so they could say they were amateurs.
They will try a new tactic now they have realized they can get away with it! What will it be this time? Nobbling the opposition? Bribing the judges?
Fair enough Eddie, but this is all about spending billions on something for the political elite whilst a massive number of people in the country are only just above starving.

'Let them eat cake' springs to mind.
Question Author
There has always been doubts about the athletes being clean in the olympics and other sports - remember those big butch East German women with Mr Universe physiques ?

In the past i've watched and enjoyed these sporting events , even though one knew that some of the athletes were not clean .

The difference with this games is the scale of the cheating .

Unfortunately with these games , more than past ones , every time you look at the podium , in the forefront of your mind will be - did he/she win purely on merit ?

This is a shame for those athletes who are standing on the podium , who are clean .

Should be interesting to see what reception the russian team gets in the opening ceremony
Question Author
indeed ymb
perhaps we should return to the original 3 events all performed naked.
As with most things sporting - money has completely taken over.

There are so many political and financial vested interests in the nonsense that is the 'purity' of sport that it makes a mockery of itself, and the people who partake, and who pay to watch.

But while the vested interests maintain the power to make the circus carry on - it will.

If the world population were to ignore it, and the associated sponsorships, it would get its house in order in about twenty-four hours!
i think this will be last big one (after russia of course and they cant afford it)
ivor - //i think this will be last big one (after russia of course and they cant afford it) //

I think the assumption that any nation cannot afford the Olympics is invalid.

Given the chance to strut and preen on the international stage, as well as trouser millions in the process, any politicians at the top of any country will 'find' the money to stage the event, no matter what state their economy is in, or how much their people are suffering.
We need things like the Olympics for all the cheating and the politics. It has, I believe, got too big tho.
The same thing happens every 4 years: doom and gloom is predicted, much of it based on wholly justifiable concerns about expense and ethics, but we always end up getting caught up in the positive side of the actual events. And we need that I think. The world won't suddenly become a paradise of virtue if it stopped: and all they money would not ever be spent on anything else anyway.
Just to support what Eddie said though: the presence of Russian competitors shows how feeble the IOC are when it comes to upholding the so called Olympic ideal
At least that arrogant homophobe Isinbaeva won't be there though; that is something to cheer :-)
12 billion is obscene in this instance.
No, I don't think it should be spending this sort of money.

Perhaps it would be better if one Olympic venue were established, possibly in Greece, or France to honour its founder, which was paid for by all the nations which compete in it.
Years ago, no one wanted to stage the games, and they were riddled by boycotts, claims of cheating, and the fact that they were too expensive to stage.
Then big business got involved and suddenly countries were falling over themselves to stage them. Occasionally they are shamelessly used by an authoritarian power to bolster its image, Berlin 1936, Sochi 2014 for example. Otherwise I say lets play. If the money really would get spent elsewhere then by all means do so but it wouldn't .
They could get back more than they spent
The last games made a huge profit: that's where I would look more closely, to see where that money goes
The blazers get fawned over and worshipped as living gods while all the volunteers get to keep their t-shirts when it's all over.
It was ever so.
you can always spend money on other things. Was there ever a city that could "afford" to stage them?

1 to 20 of 25rss feed

1 2 Next Last

Do you know the answer?

Brazil Olympics

Answer Question >>