Donate SIGN UP

Grand designs

Avatar Image
chazza | 12:27 Thu 26th Apr 2007 | Film, Media & TV
3 Answers
At the end of this programme the couple said they were "hurt" that something had ended up this way, we talked over part of it, could anyone tell me what they were hurt about?
Gravatar

Answers

1 to 3 of 3rss feed

Best Answer

No best answer has yet been selected by chazza. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.

For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
I don't think that was really explained - it confused me a bit too! I just presumed they meant because it had all cost such a lot more than they had been advised, and that they had no option but to go with it, even though their financial situation suffered for a few years afterwards.
I didn't understand this either - perhaps they fell out with their architect??
They had a tight original budget of �230,000 for the building of the property. Their architect came up with an unusual design and both he and the builders said that it could be built within this budget. At the end the building cost �380,000 - an overspend of �150,000 which put the clients in a very tight financial squeeze to the point where they even put the property on the market to sell. They were hurt because the end result was a 'project' for the architect and a 'good earner' for the builder, neither of whom seemed even remotely concerned about the overspend. Put simply, had the architect and builder been more honest with the original estimates ( you can't underestimate by �150,000 on a three bedroom house of that size! ) then the clients would not have gone with the architects fancy design but would have built something less ambitious and more within their budget - it looked as though the architect used his clients and their money ( borrowed! ) to see his unique design come to life rather than consider the impact - financially and emotionally - a huge overspend would have on his clients. The couple also admitted that they were 'not yet out of the woods financially' and I suspect that if going for the architects design means they cannot now afford to stay there, they will have lost out on a fantastic plot which, at �35,000, seemed a godsend for them with their tight budget.

Hope this wasn't too wordy and helps!

1 to 3 of 3rss feed

Do you know the answer?

Grand designs

Answer Question >>