Another Couple Of Charmers.....

[ToraToraTora]

https://news.sky.com/story/father-and-son-who-murdered-and-mutilated-men-with-blowtorch-in-edinburgh-flat-jailed-for-life-13110849

What is wrong with people?

[youngmafbog]

And the nasty left pile in again,

Simply by attacking the OP rather than address the problem you imply you dont care about the murders. Is that so diffcult to understand or are you so wrapped up in your hatred of TTT then you cant see it?

Enough now though, from me at least. Other pieces of work may decide different.

[Redhelen72]

To abuse you would mean breaking the rules - I have not broken the rules.

I have just pointed out that your use of words  appear to show that you admire these criminals.

Now if that is not the case you should consider your words more carefully. End of.

[ToraToraTora]

"I have just pointed out that your use of words  appear to show that you admire these criminals." - Perlease you are not that dim. It's clearly meant as Irony. I did it here too

https://www.theanswerbank.co.uk/News/Question1861926.html

 

[andy-hughes]

TTT Your offensive remarks will get you suspended so you can play the victim - again.

You are becoming a one-track pain.

[ToraToraTora]

come on Andy, read the thread, I'm not the bad guy here.

[jno]

part of the problem may be that you asked a rhetorical question rather than a real one, so people immediately wander off topic. Anyway, I did try to answer it early on.

[naomi24]

This is ridiculous.  It's a serious topic derailed by nonsense posts.  Given the content of the OP, I find it very difficult to believe that anyone could misconstrue TTT's sarcastic use of the word 'charmers'.  These monsters are where they should be - banged up for life.

[ToraToraTora]

naomi: "I find it very difficult to believe that anyone could misconstrue TTT's sarcastic use of the word 'charmers'.  " - Some just have hidden talents I guess.

[Deskdiary]

Using the word 'charmers' for horrible people is ironic and you'd have to have been living under rock your whole life not to know this - it is extremely widely known. Either that or it's a pretence just to have a go at TTT; I strongly suspect it's the latter.

[ladybirder]

Everyone who has been on here for a while should know exactly what TTT meant.  And yes another thread spoilt.  

[ToraToraTora]

thanks naomi, LB and DD - I was starting to wonder if I was in a parallel dimension with some of the posts above.

[retrocop]

It would be seem there is alot more beligerence on this site today. Must be a full moon tonight.

[andy-hughes]

davebro - // how can the death penalty NOT be right! //

Because it provides no deterrent, despite arguments to the contrary.

And killing by the state is not 'punishment', it's revenge, and it has no place in a civilised society.

[davebro3]

spare me your platitudes Andy

[naomi24]

We put mad dogs down not because we wish to wreak revenge, but because they are a danger to society.  It's the sensible option.

 

[andres]

We send soldiers out to kill.

[andy-hughes]

naomi - //

We put mad dogs down not because we wish to wreak revenge, but because they are a danger to society.  It's the sensible option. //

I prefer to think that we regard human beings as rather more important than dogs.

If you run over a dog, you don't get prosecuted, if you run over a person, you do.

If you kill a dog, you don't get tried and imprisoned, once again, if you kill a human, you do.

If you really think that we can simply dispatch a human being for being 'mad' in the same way we would a dog, then I am glad you are not anywhere near the decision-making process regarding capital punishment.

[andy-hughes]

Dave - // spare me your platitudes Andy //

You asked a question, I answered it.

Just because it is not to your taste does not make it a 'platitude'.

But I'll spare you my view on capital punishment if you desist in condemning to death an uncharged, untried and convicted citizen who remains innocent until proven otherwise.

Deal?

[retrocop]

//If you run over a dog, you don't get prosecuted, if you run over a person, you do.

If you kill a dog, you don't get tried and imprisoned, once again, if you kill a human, you do.//

Absolute ill informed nonsense. Try reading the Road Traffic Act with regard to vehicle driver's responsibilities with regards to collisions with certain animals. Cats you can run over with impunity. Dogs,Deer and cattle not so. They must be reported within 24hours or you could be summoned for failing to stop and report an accident. Likewise. Cruelty to dogs and causing suffering has resulted in prosecutions bought about by the RSPCA and the offenders have been imprisoned

. adinsibilities n