Donate SIGN UP

Answers

1 to 20 of 38rss feed

1 2 Next Last

Avatar Image
Enough attempted it and they were turned around. At least Australia nipped it in the bud immediately. We're pathetic allowing all these criminals and spongers to keep coming in their droves. Anybody who wishes to challenge their deportation to Rwanda ought to be made to take them into their own homes!
20:15 Mon 10th Jul 2023
Perhaps they will be sent for, along with the extended family, once those here get established. Best move the illegals back across the Channel before the virtue signallers find some legal loophole to get them all dumped here.
Disgusting, we are being infested with these undesirables and nobody cares.
Most do care but noone as come up with a workable solution
Australia managed to stop them.

Not many came in dinghys to Aussie shores though did they?? Bit further to come
Enough attempted it and they were turned around. At least Australia nipped it in the bud immediately.

We're pathetic allowing all these criminals and spongers to keep coming in their droves. Anybody who wishes to challenge their deportation to Rwanda ought to be made to take them into their own homes!
Bobbin, they came but the Aussie army was waiting and fired on them!!
Well slight exaggeration.........
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/jan/16/australian-navy-shot-in-the-air-to-turn-back-asylum-boat
It's been the view of many people in this country that we are being taken for a ride, webbo. The principle of "asylum" is being abused on an industrial scale by people who simply don't like it where they are and want to settle here instead of staying in their homelands to improve things there. Over 1,000 refugees arrived over the last weekend and it will continue on that scale so long as they are treated to board and lodging as soon as they arrive. Have a read of this thread, where the legalities of the asylum system were discussed:

https://www.theanswerbank.co.uk/News/Question1842674-2.html

And my final comment:

"It's back to basics - the idea of asylum is to provide a safe haven to those in danger. Those in France are not in danger - they'd just rather be here than there and it seems the government is quite happy to accommodate that whim. But it's got nothing to do with asylum."

It's absolutely outrageous that the people of this country are expected to fund all this in ever increasing numbers and it is simply unsustainable. People with hotel bookings (including weddings) are having their bookings cancelled so that migrants can be housed and the cost is now running at about £8m per day. It's the biggest scandal of our time and all the House of Commons is dealing with today is voting on whether one of its committees was insulted by being referred to as a kangaroo court. I've news for the MPs: the country doesn't care about what you've voted on today; but they do care about the mass uncontrolled influx that is taking place daily on the Kent coast.
could the government wave all legalities and say it's for nationla security, and just deport the lot of them, enforced by the military
army escort raf to fly the back to there home countries.
er.. which home countrys? You mean France???
bobbinwales, with the right interogation and im sure you they could get the answers, after all they are criminal chancers, how mean ehhh.
Ah torture them.?..no right to legal representation? And what when the courts say we can't send them..and when countrys refuse to take them
Shoot them in the water. That'll stop 'em!

There isn't any deterrent strong enough to stop them wanting to come here. Once there is a strong deterrent, they will stop coming. Or less numbers will.
//Ah torture them.?//

Wow, thats some jump and certainly not what was said.

Thats the problem with you on the left you see what you want to see not what is actually there.

Interrogation is not always torture, unless you are implying the numerous interrogations our Police conduct on a daily basis are torture.

Or computer programs interrogating a database torture to the DB!
//Shoot them in the water. That'll stop 'em!//

Wow 10clarionst, I'm impressed with your solution,,
Youngmafbog.these people deliberately have no papers. They will be advised to say 'no comment' or 'I'm fleeing persecution in Iraq Afghanistan etc. ...I claim asylum. Or 'no speak English...so what interorragation thats not torture do you think hasn't been thought of before.and if
I used to donate to the RNLI , no more ,they’ve become a taxi service for these 25-30 ‘children ‘
Eh?

Do you not think the Police deal with this daily?

Do you think the Police torture?

A clever interrogator will get the truth without torture, especially easy for those who are not highly educated in interrogation techniques. Just becasue they are told not to say anything doesnt mean they wont slip up whilst being spoken to.
Could we just put holes in their boats and then leave them to swim? Do this fairly soon after they leave French shores so they don't have so far to go.
There's definitely a gap in the market for a boat-holing device that doesn't cause harm to occupants.

Off to the shed to work on it right now.

1 to 20 of 38rss feed

1 2 Next Last

Do you know the answer?

Where Are The Women And Children?

Answer Question >>