Donate SIGN UP

Seems To Have Worked............

Avatar Image
ToraToraTora | 12:40 Fri 29th Apr 2022 | News
41 Answers
Gravatar

Answers

21 to 40 of 41rss feed

First Previous 1 2 3 Next Last

Best Answer

No best answer has yet been selected by ToraToraTora. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.

For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
Ken seems to have just beaten me to it with a link but here's Aunty Beeb's version anyway:
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-kent-61293693
Back to normal then since they have relised it's just the normal bs.
Billy Wind has obviously gone back to bed :-/
// Australia will spend nearly $812m (about £400m) on its offshore immigration processing system next year – just under $3.4m for each of the 239 people now held on Nauru or in Papua New Guinea. //

Patel has budgeted a quarter of that - £120m, which would offshore 60 people. We had 254 just yesterday, and look on target to beat last years 28,000.

It would cost over £45 BILLION annually to send our refugees to Rwanda.

//It would cost over £45 BILLION annually to send our refugees to Rwanda. //

How much to keep them here in unlimited numbers?
Seems NOT to have worked then,no comment from you,thought not.
*Surprised*
Question Author
so gromit and the rest of the 5C want it to not work. wight oh!
Question Author
//It would cost over £45 BILLION annually to send our refugees to Rwanda. //
it wont because as we already see the threat of it alone is enough and once we have actually sent some there it'll be game over.
It's not a matter of not wanting it to work, Tora simply the fact that it's NOT working as shown by the latest arrivals.
Unless you credit The Fat Liar with control over the weather in which case he and his crack team are indeed geniuses.
You said it was game over on Friday.
Then 254 made the crossing yesterday.

If 2800 come and only 50 are sent to Rwanda, then the odds are in favour of coming. For every 56 who get here, just one is sent oversea.
Question Author
doug, nothing will work 100% it worked for 10 days, lets see when the first plane load actually does get sent to Rwanda.
Question Author
so we had exactly the right kind of weather for 10 days immediately after the Rwanda deal was done! right oh!
The
Weather
Was
Too
Bad
For
Dinghies
To
Put
To
Sea.
Question Author
bit of a coincidence doug.
Are you a flat earther too?
The crossings stopped
in the days prior to the Act being passed and you said it was working.

The Bill is now an Act and the crossings have started again so how do you explain that?

Let's send drug takers to Rwanda too, while doing nothing about drug dealers, obviously.

Not that I'm religious, but the Archbishop of Canterbury put it perfectly ... outsourcing responsibility.

21 to 40 of 41rss feed

First Previous 1 2 3 Next Last

Do you know the answer?

Seems To Have Worked............

Answer Question >>