Donate SIGN UP

Does The West Have An Obligation To Take In Afghan Refugees?

Avatar Image
Untitled | 11:25 Tue 17th Aug 2021 | News
83 Answers
Coalition was there for 20 years and has left things worse than they found them...

is resettling those who can flee the taliban the least we can do or shall we batten down the hatches and leave them to their fate?

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-58238490

Link is about the uk obviously but my question is about all parties of the coalition including USA...
Gravatar

Answers

41 to 60 of 83rss feed

First Previous 1 2 3 4 5 Next Last

Best Answer

No best answer has yet been selected by Untitled. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.

For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
The NATO countries that participated in this debacle should bear the brunt of sorting out the human consequences.

Pixie.
You are confusing Asylum Seekers with Refugees, they are different. Asylum seekers ought to get to the nearest safe country. Refugees are fleeing a war or danger and make for where ever they feel safest.
Those men who are granted asylum can then send for their wives, daughters, grannies etc. For each male granted asylum expect another ten females later.
I said refugees, gromit. Not asylum seekers.
//If you have said the former but agree with the latter then you're a complete hypocrite.//

Not at all.

Lots of things go on in the world that many people here find distasteful, abhorrent or simply barbaric. But that doesn't mean we should accommodate the alleged victims from those places here. Some pretty nasty things used to go on here and in Europe during the middle ages and before. But the country evolved, developed, became more enlightened and gradually those practices stopped. That's what must happen in other places. Either that or they remain as they are.

Western leaders need to understand that (1) they cannot cure the world of all of (what they see as) its ills and (2) they cannot accommodate everybody who is not too fond of the place they live in. The first reaction of people in such places is to up sticks and flee. Well they are the only people who can alter their lot and that of those around them. Upping sticks simply perpetuates the disorder and there's no reason why Western personnel should have their safety compromised if those who live there cannot organise themselves to counter it. Furthermore, there's even less of a reason why those who do flee should be accommodated elsewhere.
Eve1974

They are not Asylum Seekers.
If we evacuate them using British aircraft, we have already accepted that they are refugees. And we will look after them as refugees.
An asylum seeker is someone who just turns up in our country without any prior arrangement and says ‘protect me’.
Question Author
" I don't know why we are only bothering with men, who should be standing up for themselves"

A bit sexist pixie... i understand that taliban rule is worse for women but the idea that men should just lump it is wrong.
Khando.

"(Weltanschauung)"

Never heard of the term but after looking it up, I still fail to grasp the concept.
My understanding was that pre 2001 under the Taliban it was a repressive society particularly to women and although the main aim of the West was too root out society, Westernisation of the county was a deliberate sideline.
Apologies pixie,
Refugees aren’t meant to go to the nearest safe country, they head for anywhere they will be safe.
Question Author
NewJudge

the countries that participated in the coalition occupying Afghanistan are in part responsible for the current situation... surely that means we have some obligation to people we have actually wronged?

would you be willing to send those who escape the Taliban back to their deaths?
I didn't say they should lump it, untitled. But neither should they run away, leaving the most vulnerable behind.
Sqad.
Weltanschauung- how the world sees a particular group or thing.I this case I think Khandro was referring to how the world sees Muslims.I may be wrong of course.




Question Author
I would run away from the taliban pixie!

So would most of us i imagine.
Danny....yes I suppose so.
Question Author
The fastest/easiest route out of a dangerous place will not necessarily take you to the nearest country... the border might be closer, but far more dangerous than trying to get on a plane. If you're desperate, you take the best option available to you. As any of us would.
sqad; I use the word, as do many English speakers not only philosophers, not to show off, but because the nearest word in English 'world view' isn't adequate.

In relation to a Muslim it is a total outlook on themselves personally & to society, to politics & leadership, God & religion, family, history & the universe.

Our 'Weltanschauung' is different from theirs as you need look no further to see than how the immigrant population of Europe has singularly failed to follow the socialist ideology of 'integration'.
They don't want our politics & lifestyles, but they are happy to have what might be called the creature comforts.

Integration is a myth & it is wrong to think that the typical Afghani longs to live like we do.
I agree to taking those who worked with Coalition forces but not refugees en mass
Would they not be better served relocating in nearby Muslim countries instead ?
I want to see bordering Arab and Muslim countries doing their fair share for a change instead of relying on the West for everything
Ironic that my local council is asking for landlords to get in touch if they have empty properties
I would rather see us sort our own homeless first and especially ex forces people
It would be just like this country to house an Afghan before one of our own citizens
Maybe a few lefty politicians will adopt an Afghan along with Lineker ?
Will not hold my breath though
Untitled
If you're desperate, you take the best option available to you. As any of us would.

Or you stand and fight like so many did in WW2
You cannot keep running forever
Question Author
Very easy to say "stand and fight" from our position stickybottle... I think you'll find lots of people fled the nazis, and with good reason.
Untitled
Question Author Very easy to say "stand and fight" from our position stickybottle... I think you'll find lots of people fled the nazis, and with good reason.

Yes it is because we have been doing it for them for 20 years
As Biden says it is now their turn
Boris says we do have an obligation, and intends to resettle 20,000 Afghan refugees.

// Women, children and religious minorities will be prioritised in a new UK resettlement scheme for 20,000 Afghan refugees, Boris Johnson will announce, acknowledging that those who helped the western coalition over two decades are now most at risk from the Taliban takeover. //

41 to 60 of 83rss feed

First Previous 1 2 3 4 5 Next Last

Do you know the answer?

Does The West Have An Obligation To Take In Afghan Refugees?

Answer Question >>

Related Questions

Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.