Sussexes Pay Back Frogmore Debt...

[Mozz71]

I notice there's nothing about this as yet. I guess ABers only really care about negative stories about Harry and Meghan.

https://www.etonline.com/prince-harry-pays-back-31-million-spent-on-frogmore-cottage-renovations-152615

[Mozz71]

//are you really taking seriously the resident ah's farcical statement that a producer knows "cameramen, carpenters, lighting crews and so on"?//

Not really, but I'm offering a right to reply as I'm not 100% sure what the detailed role of a producer is, as I'm not in the industry!

[jno]

something about it here, Mozz

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Film_crew

But as that notes, the boundaries are pretty porous. On smaller films/TV shows, producers can get involved in hiring crew. On bigger ones they may just throw money.

[andy-hughes]

Jno, in that case, Netflix throw eight figures at the Sussex's, so they can be rich producers, and throw it back to Netflix? I don't think that's quite how it works, do you?

[andy-hughes]

Mozz, if you admit that you don't know what a producer is, how do you know my statement is 'farcical '?

You can't have it both ways.

[Mozz71]

//Mozz, if you admit that you don't know what a producer is, how do you know my statement is 'farcical '?//

I didn't say it was farcical, that was Sanmac.

[andy-hughes]

My apologies.

Sanmac?

[naomi24]

Mozz, //As usual Naomi, you seek to hammer home your point by trying to belittle any cotrary opinions.//

I haven’t belittled anyone’s opinions. I took issue with your invented scenario.

//I'll say it again slowly so it gets in this time//

^And speaking of belittling contrary opinions …..you’re rather good at that.

//As for my being upset by criticism against them, I honestly don't give two hoots about them ….//

You began this thread by saying //I guess ABers only really care about negative stories about Harry and Meghan.// … and another thread on the same subject was peppered with your protests at criticism of them so it’s rather difficult to believe you don’t care.

//What annoys me is small minded people such as yourself demonizing anybody without good reason.//

Oh dear. You’re annoyed and I’m small minded? Why? Because I disagree with you? That doesn’t seem good reason for you to demonize me - but you do. Bit of a plank and eye job going on there. Furthermore, I don’t criticise them without good reason. Their arrogant, bombastic behaviour makes them the authors of their own misfortune.

As for Harry and Meghan as producers, they say "Our focus will be on creating content that informs but also gives hope," "As new parents, making inspirational family programming is also important to us."

Well, whoopee! How on earth has the world managed up to now without the benefit of their wisdom? I can’t see them turning up with runners and scenery shifters in tow - but they intend to inform you and give you hope - so happy watching.

[Spicerack]

^Perfect.
Mozz made it clear on that other thread that anyone criticizing H&M is motivated by racism.
(In his fervid imagination)
Ought to be forced to watch H&M's first series of 'sermons for the little people' without a break or a suicide tablet, IMO.

[Mozz71]

Naomi, you have you beliefs and I have mine, I could go through each point you make and make a counter point, but it is going to lead to a never ending to and fro, so I'm going to leave it at that.

[Mozz71]

//Mozz made it clear on that other thread that anyone criticizing H&M is motivated by racism.
(In his fervid imagination)//

I have never stated that, as I don't believe it. You're either m istaking me for someone else or just making crap up. Which thread are you on about, and what comment did I allegedly make?

[andy-hughes]

sanmac - // Mozz71, are you really taking seriously the resident ah's farcical statement that a producer knows "cameramen, carpenters, lighting crews and so on"? //

Why is it 'farcical'?

[Spicerack]

Avatar Image Mozz71
//Busy not being a mixed-race, American, divorcee I expect. Aiding a paedophile is less of an issue to some it seems.//

Not the first time you've laid these slurs at other ABers who never bring race into it.

[andy-hughes]

Spicerack - // Avatar Image Mozz71
//Busy not being a mixed-race, American, divorcee I expect. Aiding a paedophile is less of an issue to some it seems.//

Not the first time you've laid these slurs at other ABers who never bring race into it. //

Bringing in posts from another thread is really not going to help this one to stay on track.

Why don't we stick to what has been said on here, and go with that.

[naomi24]

AH, Spicerack is free to choose what he wants to post.

[naomi24]

Mozz, //I'm going to leave it at that. //

That doesn't surprise me in the least. Wise choice.

[Mozz71]

and that is supposed to be an example of "anyone criticizing H&M is motivated by racism"?I

In the words oft used on AB, get a grip.

Andy, I did invite evidence of his accusations against me Andy, much like you have with Sanmac. Only fair he got a chance to back up his claim.

[andy-hughes]

naomi - // AH, Spicerack is free to choose what he wants to post. //

I am not suggesting otherwise, and I don;t need you to point out the freedoms of the site to me thank you, I have been enjoying them a lot longer than you have.

My point is, if a precident is started where people bring in posts from other threads without context, it encourages de-railing, which no-one would want.

I am sure Spicerack is able to take that suggestion on board and adopt it or ignore it, and comment or not, as he sees fit, he does not need a babysitter.

[naomi24]

Spicerack wasn't out of order. No explanation necessary.

[naomi24]

AH at 22:58, I'm also free to post as I choose.

[Mozz71]

//I have been enjoying them a lot longer than you have.//

That's a little petty Andy, you've been a member a full five months longer than Naomi. Not much considering you've both been members around 15 years.