Donate SIGN UP
Gravatar

Answers

1 to 20 of 36rss feed

1 2 Next Last

Best Answer

No best answer has yet been selected by anotheoldgit. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.

For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
It should - but judges are bound by sentencing guidelines, and so we often see criminals receiving sentences that the majority would think too lenient in the circumstances of their crimes.
Isn't 32 years longer than life sentence? Evil, evil woman in any case.
Or at least, longer in prison.
//In England and Wales, the average life sentence prisoner serves around 15 years before being paroled, although those convicted of exceptionally grave crimes remain behind bars for considerably longer; Ian Huntley was given a minimum term of 40 years.//
Pixie, a life sentence is indeterminate.
Ah, thanks Danny x but this is a "minimum" of 32 years, so that is indeterminate too
It may be longer.
dam savage should never see the light of day again.
TTT - // dam savage should never see the light of day again. //

Do you have that on a soft-key on your keyboard, so you don't have to type it each and every time?
I hope she does serve longer than her minimum.

Some don't deserve the precious gift of parenthood.
Surely some other adults had contact with these babies/ children ?
It is life. She will serve 32 years before being considered for release. If released it will be on licence.

There is therefore the hope that this evil witch will NEVER be freed.
This is just beyond belief that any mother could do this to her little children.
Anne, I'm sure they did but unless something is obviously suspicious no one would think a mother would murder her own children.
I don't understand why she had those children in the first place.
Question Author
andy-hughes

Are you suggesting that this particular creature isn't a very savage person?
It is life. Life with a minimum of 32 years. That means she might or might not be released after 32 years, and will definitely not be released before then. It also means that if she is released, she'll be "on licence" and can be recalled to jail at any time.
Question Author
Tilly2

/// I don't understand why she had those children in the first place. ///

Taking her life style into consideration, it is a wonder she didn't have more.

If she didn't want the children, because they interrupted her life style, why did she prevent the father from having access to them.

Well at least her life style will be put on hold for at least 32 years she will then be 55 years old.
I do hope the other female prisoners will make he life a misery.

Barmaid, you have an echo.
She is indeed a savage. I hope her 32 years are long and hard. There is another article on Mail Online where she was trying to sell a bag of her dead babies clothes for £20 !!!
Has she appealed? This story is literally unbelievable.

1 to 20 of 36rss feed

1 2 Next Last

Do you know the answer?

Evil Woman Gets 32 Years For The Murder Of Her Two Lovely Little Daughters, It Should Have Been Life.

Answer Question >>

Related Questions

Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.