Fully responsible for what?
Do you not think the Lawers representing the syrian boy would sue TR if he wasn't responsible?
A boy was attacked because TR made videos, with words coming from TRs mouth to his massive audience of known hooligans calling for an attack (basically) on this boy.
So yes i bloody think he's responsible even if partly it doesn't change the fact at all how can you justify this man or even pettly argue for him?
He lied saying this boy did things he never did, called for violence on the boy and the situation, the boy got attacked. 1+1=2 das quick maths