Crosswords2 mins ago
Questions For The British Home Secretary
Lots of 'first times' on here, including the first in this post to sign in on the Koran. Where is Britain heading?
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by Khandro. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.FF //"International outrage is quite rightly being directed at Britain". Really?//
Yes really; Questions have been asked by American congressmen, there have been protests in Australia and in several European countries, countless questions asked on videos other than this one and what we ashamedly get from some on this site are words, like 'rubbish' and 'garbage', would those dishing out these lies, care to explain what they think is factually wrong with anything stated by Paul Weston?
I suggest if an a
Yes really; Questions have been asked by American congressmen, there have been protests in Australia and in several European countries, countless questions asked on videos other than this one and what we ashamedly get from some on this site are words, like 'rubbish' and 'garbage', would those dishing out these lies, care to explain what they think is factually wrong with anything stated by Paul Weston?
I suggest if an a
Okay Naomi.
"Please bear in mind that asking a British Home Secretary to look into these issues of the phsyical and psychological torture of Tommy Robinson might just be affected by the extraordinary fact that for the first time in the history of our country we have in Sajid Javid a Home Secretary who swore his oath of political office on the Koran. Welcome to our present in totalitarian Sharia Britain and welcome to our future. It's Tommy and others today; tomorrow it will be all of us."
What's all that about then?
As for your other question- is any of what acceptable?
"Please bear in mind that asking a British Home Secretary to look into these issues of the phsyical and psychological torture of Tommy Robinson might just be affected by the extraordinary fact that for the first time in the history of our country we have in Sajid Javid a Home Secretary who swore his oath of political office on the Koran. Welcome to our present in totalitarian Sharia Britain and welcome to our future. It's Tommy and others today; tomorrow it will be all of us."
What's all that about then?
As for your other question- is any of what acceptable?
It's a pretty poor esponse, Naomi. It's a tactic some use on here but we can see through it. Post a length video from an unreliable source and then when people with better things to do don't watch teh whole thing someone says " could that be that they know they'll happen upon uncomfortable truths too difficult to address?"
Twaddle
Twaddle
There are certainly serious problems with established media outlets. They run on an unsustainable 24-hour cycle, they copy-paste too much from wire agencies that goes unchecked, they've largely abandoned investigative journalism (even the biggest 'scoops' of the past 10 years have been handed to newspapers rather than discovered through judicious investigation), and they rely overmuch on pundits rather than proper journalists.
But let's try to keep some perspective. Bad is bad. Atrocious is atrocious. I am not convinced that the solution to this problem is to ditch the media and instead start getting our information from unhinged conspiracy theorists on youtube who profit (via Patreon and other means) from extremist bilge.
But let's try to keep some perspective. Bad is bad. Atrocious is atrocious. I am not convinced that the solution to this problem is to ditch the media and instead start getting our information from unhinged conspiracy theorists on youtube who profit (via Patreon and other means) from extremist bilge.
fiction-factory, //What's all that about then?//
It isn’t saying //his treatment was due to having a Muslim Home Secretary and Sharia Law,//. As far as I’m aware the Home Secretary wasn’t responsible for the conditions he was subjected to in prison …. or was he? As for Sharia Law … in that prison …..debatable.
//is any of what acceptable?//
Incarcerating him in a prison that has the highest percentage of Muslim inmates, giving him a cell close to the mosque, leaving his cell door unlocked, and allowing Muslim prisoners to prepare his food, which for obvious reasons, he wouldn’t eat? Is any of that acceptable?
//could that be that they know they'll happen upon uncomfortable truths too difficult to address?"
Twaddle//
Why twaddle? Why a poor response? You’ve avoided my question – and you’ve watched the video! Still, I’ve explained it now, so perhaps we’ll have better luck.
It isn’t saying //his treatment was due to having a Muslim Home Secretary and Sharia Law,//. As far as I’m aware the Home Secretary wasn’t responsible for the conditions he was subjected to in prison …. or was he? As for Sharia Law … in that prison …..debatable.
//is any of what acceptable?//
Incarcerating him in a prison that has the highest percentage of Muslim inmates, giving him a cell close to the mosque, leaving his cell door unlocked, and allowing Muslim prisoners to prepare his food, which for obvious reasons, he wouldn’t eat? Is any of that acceptable?
//could that be that they know they'll happen upon uncomfortable truths too difficult to address?"
Twaddle//
Why twaddle? Why a poor response? You’ve avoided my question – and you’ve watched the video! Still, I’ve explained it now, so perhaps we’ll have better luck.