Jokes1 min ago
Has Anyone Told Queen Nicola, We Do Not Need Their Consent?
32 Answers
Answers
"Should the Brexit referendum have allowed citizens of the rest of the EU to vote?" Not quite the same thing, jno. Not quite the same thing at all. The EU is not (yet) and independent sovereign nation and citizens from other EU nations should have no say over the affairs of another member state, even if it is associated with EU membership. But more than that,...
13:27 Tue 15th May 2018
The main issue is under Westminster control, but having been daft enough to set up these other levels of government in all but England (because the English can't have what others do, although truth been known it's an expense we all ought to do without) there are now devolved power issues.
"Both sides have agreed that some powers should go into UK-wide frameworks, but differ over how this should be done and who should have the final say over them in future."
She's going to take every opportunity to be as awkward as possible, we all know this.
"Both sides have agreed that some powers should go into UK-wide frameworks, but differ over how this should be done and who should have the final say over them in future."
She's going to take every opportunity to be as awkward as possible, we all know this.
-- answer removed --
"Should the Brexit referendum have allowed citizens of the rest of the EU to vote?"
Not quite the same thing, jno. Not quite the same thing at all.
The EU is not (yet) and independent sovereign nation and citizens from other EU nations should have no say over the affairs of another member state, even if it is associated with EU membership. But more than that, there are not vast sums of EU taxpayers' money being shovelled across the English Channel every week to support the UK (quite the reverse in fact). In contrast, huge lorry loads of English tax revenue head up the M6 every night to fund the outrageous "Barnett Formula" which provides about £2k per head per annum more to the Scots than to the English. Successive governments have refused to do anything about this iniquity and, as a result of the Westminster government's largesse, the Scots now have their own spending plans which enable them to provide "free" goods and services which English taxpayers have to pay for.
The question is not simply that of Scottish independence but also of Scotland's membership of the United Kingdom. It is not unreasonable, therefore, for the entire UK electorate to be asked if they want this blatant unfairness, which has only been exacerbated by devolution, to continue.
Not quite the same thing, jno. Not quite the same thing at all.
The EU is not (yet) and independent sovereign nation and citizens from other EU nations should have no say over the affairs of another member state, even if it is associated with EU membership. But more than that, there are not vast sums of EU taxpayers' money being shovelled across the English Channel every week to support the UK (quite the reverse in fact). In contrast, huge lorry loads of English tax revenue head up the M6 every night to fund the outrageous "Barnett Formula" which provides about £2k per head per annum more to the Scots than to the English. Successive governments have refused to do anything about this iniquity and, as a result of the Westminster government's largesse, the Scots now have their own spending plans which enable them to provide "free" goods and services which English taxpayers have to pay for.
The question is not simply that of Scottish independence but also of Scotland's membership of the United Kingdom. It is not unreasonable, therefore, for the entire UK electorate to be asked if they want this blatant unfairness, which has only been exacerbated by devolution, to continue.
New judge ///Very possibly. But before she gets her Parish Council involved in the intricacies brought about by the ridiculous devolution arrangements provided by Mr Blair, has she finished decorating her spare room so that she can take in the Syrian refugee she promised she would about three years ago?///
You are very disrespectful for a person calling them selves a judge. It’s not a parish council and she never made that promise you keep saying she made.
She said she would be happy to take in a refugee, no promise to take one in
You are very disrespectful for a person calling them selves a judge. It’s not a parish council and she never made that promise you keep saying she made.
She said she would be happy to take in a refugee, no promise to take one in
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.