Donate SIGN UP
Gravatar

Answers

1 to 20 of 40rss feed

1 2 Next Last

Best Answer

No best answer has yet been selected by anotheoldgit. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.

For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
It seems more likely that the Judge has agreed that he can go on holiday with his family during the period *before* sentencing. Sentencing has not been delayed or deferred, it is natural for a hiatus whilst reports are being prepared......

The details of his offence are scant but if imprisonment is appropriate then hopefully that's what will happen.
Bizarre. I wonder if his family will welcome his presence.

Then again, I’m assured that prisons are just like holiday camps, so perhaps it won’t make much difference.
nothing is unbelievable these days
Jack, if the report is correct, she did delay sentencing?

\\\Sentencing has not been delayed or deferred\\\
But the Link states
///Cook was warned he faced jail by Ms Rippon,
who agreed to delaying sentencing///

She's ordered an 'all options' report and won't sentence until that has been delivered to her.
She would do that whatever his proposed travel plans......all she seems to have done is give him unconditional rather than conditional bail...
We know the report is incorrect because it describes this man as a paedophile when he isn't. That's a DM favourite to get the blood boiling.

As has already been stated by jackthehat, a deferral of sentencing is the norm when psychiatric reports have to be obtained - the report clearly states that this is required in this instance. As a prison sentence is not guaranteed for this offence then it is normal that he be released before sentencing.
he's guilty, he should be in custody pending sentence not gallivanting round the lake district. Another judge out of touch, madness.
This is when the word
“Justice”
Becomes
“Unjustfarce”

I’ve always said that some judges are extremely harsh on robbers evt.. but strangely lenient with paedophiles and you really have to wonder why this is or not as I think it’s pretty obvious that maybe the judges and convict may possibly share certain interests.

I wonder how rested. the judge would sleep at night if this person then went on to abuse another child.

Probably great and interrupted as some judges seem to live in a parallel universe to the rest of us.
what if he commits another offence of this nature whilst on this trip? The judge should be protecting the public from this sort of lowlife.
I suggest that the Judge is in possession of more pertinent facts than the DM has published or anyone reading the article has inferred.
What is He then,jack? He has admitted it.
Based on the dearth of information given in the DM article is difficult to tell.
He seems to have broken the law and will, hopefully, be dealt with acccordingly.
Wow, some people are strangely blasé about this...
But then again has anyone read the facts of the original case? This could just be mass hysteria spread by the mass lying media so let’s calm down and get some perspective before picking up our pitchforks, lighting our torches, forming an angry mob and heading to “angry hill”
It says only that the girl was under 16, not that she was below puberty, so we’d have to take the Mail’s word that she was the latter, and I don’t.
He is not a paedo but he is a sex offender with an underage child.

I really don't get the judges logic here, firstly why on earth would his family want him near them and secondly surely there is a risk of skipping bail as it is a serious offence?

In addition it sends all the wrong signals on how the Courts view this sort of crime.
Er,
The Judge wants the result of a couple of reports, and what they conclude will help determine what sentence she lays down. The reports will take some time to prepare, so that is the reason for the delay, not so he can go on holiday.

// A psychiatric report will also be carried out after the court heard Cook suffered from 'a number of educational and emotional difficulties'.
Ordering an all options report, Judge Rippon told him: 'I'm releasing you on unconditional bail so you are free to go on that holiday with your family. //

So a twisting of the facts by the Mail to concoct a story where there isn’t one.
“I think it’s pretty obvious that maybe the judges and convict may possibly share certain interests.“

Sorry that was wrong terminology and maybe I should have said that it appears in some cases that the judges “sympathise” with those convicted for offences like this otherwise why the leniency and “mickey mouse” sentences?
Question Author
Strange how some queued up to label a certain footballer a paedophile.

1 to 20 of 40rss feed

1 2 Next Last

Do you know the answer?

This Is Unbelievable, Paedophile Can Go On Holiday Before Being Sentenced.

Answer Question >>

Related Questions

Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.