Three Quarters Of Gps Want To Go On...
News1 min ago
Corbyn Refuses To Attend Israel Dinner
Netanyahu in London, centenary of Balfour Declaration, next week. But the a-hole is happy to send Emily Thornberry, shadow foreign minister. Why has he not got the balls to attend, or explain why he wishes not to attend. And why leave it to Thornberry (Lady Neuberger)?
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by scooping. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
"like why you need to describe a person as you do in your second sentence"
I agree completely - it's just ignorance coupled with lack of vocabulary. It's not just the OP, though - there's a tendency to refer to public figures, especially politicians, using insulting nicknames all over this site. Regrettably, the Ed couldn't care less...
I agree completely - it's just ignorance coupled with lack of vocabulary. It's not just the OP, though - there's a tendency to refer to public figures, especially politicians, using insulting nicknames all over this site. Regrettably, the Ed couldn't care less...
//Kromo, you can be anti without having hate..//
Okay... you're saying Corbyn is anti-Jew and doesn't hate them? Because an anti-semite kind of by definition hates jews.
Or are you taking Khandro's view that JC is opposed to the state of Israel and/or doesn't believe it should have been created? Because that isn't anti-semitism.
Okay... you're saying Corbyn is anti-Jew and doesn't hate them? Because an anti-semite kind of by definition hates jews.
Or are you taking Khandro's view that JC is opposed to the state of Israel and/or doesn't believe it should have been created? Because that isn't anti-semitism.
//Some of us are adults and act like it - the site has no age guidance or restriction//
A) I'm pretty sure it does have a minimum age
B) It is up to parents to keep kids off sites they cannot handle. I am not babying my speech or behaviour because some hypothetical kid may or not be present and "affected" (boo hoo).They are not anyone else's problem.
A) I'm pretty sure it does have a minimum age
B) It is up to parents to keep kids off sites they cannot handle. I am not babying my speech or behaviour because some hypothetical kid may or not be present and "affected" (boo hoo).They are not anyone else's problem.
Does the site have that?
I said on page 1 why I discourage them from joining in what could be good sensible news threads, you can call someone out as JJ has just proved without resorting the bar-room sound bites.
I'll leave you to the grown up discussion now.
I have agreed he should be open and honest about his non attendance.
I said on page 1 why I discourage them from joining in what could be good sensible news threads, you can call someone out as JJ has just proved without resorting the bar-room sound bites.
I'll leave you to the grown up discussion now.
I have agreed he should be open and honest about his non attendance.
Hans...I have never denied not being biased. I am a committed Labour supporter and have every intention of remaining so.
But the language used on here today is uncalled for.
I have had posts removed because I used a popular slang word for testicles, which I accept, and now use other ways of saying the same thing. But the use of the terms "a hole" and "butthole" I find childish and puerile, which is why I have reported them.
Ed may choose to act or not, as he thinks fit.
But the language used on here today is uncalled for.
I have had posts removed because I used a popular slang word for testicles, which I accept, and now use other ways of saying the same thing. But the use of the terms "a hole" and "butthole" I find childish and puerile, which is why I have reported them.
Ed may choose to act or not, as he thinks fit.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.