Would You Give Up Territory For Peace?.
ChatterBank3 mins ago
If A Christian Couple Can Be Fined For Refusing To Sell Something They Believe Is Against Their Religion Then Why No Action Against This Person?
435 Answers
OK, so IMHO religion is the root of most evil but lets forget that bit because what I am trying to understand is why there seems to be one rule for one and another for a certain other religion we all have to bend ovcer backwards to accommodate?
http://
http://
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by youngmafbog. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
// inviting people to have an anti-Muslim rant//
So why did I point out most Muslims I know who run business are happy to serve it?
What I was getting at is why does one religious fanatic get roasted (many christian bakers would have just got on and peddled the cake) and another doesn't.
I think Andy in the last two sentences of his post has pointed out why.
So why did I point out most Muslims I know who run business are happy to serve it?
What I was getting at is why does one religious fanatic get roasted (many christian bakers would have just got on and peddled the cake) and another doesn't.
I think Andy in the last two sentences of his post has pointed out why.
\\In this instance, and employee who does not normally work on a section selling alcohol was placed on a checkout where serving wine was required.\\
//But it doesn't actually say that, if it's read correctly, it says
The store confirmed the member of staff worked on a kiosk where alcohol is 'generally not purchased' and would request another colleague's help if the situation arose again in the future//.
"In other words if someone came to her usual workstation with Alcohol."
Sounds like Tesco had her employed in a reasonably Alcohol free area already.
//The customer has the same recourse in law should he wish to pursue the issue.//
How true, let's hope the shopper considers himself to be part of some sort of "minority community" and has the backing of a pressure group who will gleefully take up and fund a prosecution, just for the mischief, then. .
How true, let's hope the shopper considers himself to be part of some sort of "minority community" and has the backing of a pressure group who will gleefully take up and fund a prosecution, just for the mischief, then. .
YMB - //What I was getting at is why does one religious fanatic get roasted (many christian bakers would have just got on and peddled the cake) and another doesn't. //
Very simple. The first instance involved breaking the laws governing prejudice, and the second instance did not break the law at all.
Very simple. The first instance involved breaking the laws governing prejudice, and the second instance did not break the law at all.
andy-hughes
But they are religious grounds, based on a known system of religious values and edicts.
Or as I see it ... based on ***.
andy-hughes
That is not the same as wanting not to serve cigarettes because you don't like smoking - if that was discussed at the interview, the store would reasonably withhold a job offer, and the situation would not arise.
Can a store reasonable tell someone' we are withholding the job offer because you are a religious nutter who won't do the job we require you to' ?
But they are religious grounds, based on a known system of religious values and edicts.
Or as I see it ... based on ***.
andy-hughes
That is not the same as wanting not to serve cigarettes because you don't like smoking - if that was discussed at the interview, the store would reasonably withhold a job offer, and the situation would not arise.
Can a store reasonable tell someone' we are withholding the job offer because you are a religious nutter who won't do the job we require you to' ?
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.