Immediate 1.1 Alora Erfahrungen
Business & Finance17 mins ago
Should Britain Now Take Military Action Against Is?
Just caught a bit of the television news where someone said public opinion is changing and the people of this country are now generally in favour of Britain taking military action against IS. What do you think? Yes or no?
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by naomi24. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
Decisive action should be taken now, there will of course be a reaction from others of their kind. Double safety measures should be taken, but treat any other jihadists the same way. It means our Border patrols should be on alert too a well as our own home-grown idiots. As for Jihadi Johnny I say lets play Russian roulette with his head (by sword) for a few outings before ending his misery.
Well exactly AyG.
No point having a deterrent that doesn't deter anyone.
These fanatics are only able to operate because of tacit/covert support from Middle Eastern Governments.
We must know which ones they are (or we're wasting shedloads of money on GCHQ etc).
I suggest a list is produced of suspect capital cities - with an indication that we'll be nuking one for every hostage that is beheaded.
That might concentrate a few minds ... and if our bluff is called then there will be some nicely glowing holes in the *** end of nowhere - no loss to world civilisation at all.
No point having a deterrent that doesn't deter anyone.
These fanatics are only able to operate because of tacit/covert support from Middle Eastern Governments.
We must know which ones they are (or we're wasting shedloads of money on GCHQ etc).
I suggest a list is produced of suspect capital cities - with an indication that we'll be nuking one for every hostage that is beheaded.
That might concentrate a few minds ... and if our bluff is called then there will be some nicely glowing holes in the *** end of nowhere - no loss to world civilisation at all.
Strong ruthless leaders like Assad in Syria and Saddam in Iraq, with the tacit support of the West, held the lid on things.
It's not too late for the West to fall in behind Assad and surely it isn't beyond the wit of the FO and State Department to find someone to replace Saddam.
Outside military action won't provide any sort of a permanent solution. So no.
It's not too late for the West to fall in behind Assad and surely it isn't beyond the wit of the FO and State Department to find someone to replace Saddam.
Outside military action won't provide any sort of a permanent solution. So no.
this poll suggests most people don't even want airstrikes, let alone ground forces
http://
http://
What is the best solution? Sit and do nothing and let them carry on?, it is a dangerous game sandy, we have the enemy within now, measures will have to be taken to stop this whole business from exploding across Europe if the Uk and the US handle things badly. Their compatriots in the Arab world are doing nothing to prevent their actions so we must presume they are complicit.
We can thank Tony Blair and George Bush for opening this can of worms, I only wish Blair was made to stand to account.
We can thank Tony Blair and George Bush for opening this can of worms, I only wish Blair was made to stand to account.
-- answer removed --
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.