Indeed there were Saki, paltry though they were:
http://www.theanfieldwrap.com/2013/05/what-about-justice-for-heysel/
From the link:
For many years, Liverpool ’s response to Heysel was woefully inadequate. I was shown a copy of the club’s official yearbook for 1985/86. There were two articles about the tragedy on page three, but they were both of the “Let’s put this behind us, improve the matchday Anfield atmosphere and look to restore the club’s good name” variety. There was no direct reference to what had happened. There was no hint of an apology. Later there was a round-up of the previous European Cup campaign, in which 1985/86 was identified as a “watershed” because it would be Liverpool ’s last for some time.
Over time, there was a recognition that more – much more – needed to be done. In 2000 the city of Liverpool officially commemorated the anniversary of Heysel for the first time – on the suggestion, incidentally, of Peter Millea, the chairman of Liverpool City Council’s Hillsborough disaster working party.
mikey4444, I'm not denying that what took place in Sheffield was criminal, far from it. Unlike you though, I recognise the need for justice in regards to bith disasters.
Yours is the kind of attitude that was seen in the red half of Merseyside for far too long, as is borne out in the link. Some at least are prepared to stand up and admit the clubs failings in regards to Heysel but others, as I suggested, deem it insignificant in regards to Hillsborough by virtue of nothing more than a 1/3 body count.