Donate SIGN UP

Tuart Hall To Be Sued - What A Surprise

Avatar Image
VHG | 07:50 Sat 04th May 2013 | News
88 Answers
I did say a week or so back on this forum that many of these people who are bringing up old cases like Stuart Hall's case are doing it mainly to extract money from the "rich and famous".

Well here we have proof, a number of people are now going to sue Stuart Hall.

What next, adverts on TV saying "Been molested by a famous person- go to web site ive_been_molested.com - there is no win no fee".

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-22406035
Gravatar

Answers

61 to 80 of 88rss feed

First Previous 1 2 3 4 5 Next Last

Best Answer

No best answer has yet been selected by VHG. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.

For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
And some of the victims may well do that.........but what does it matter if they don't?
Fred....
A body of rights, obligations, and remedies that is applied by courts in civil proceedings to provide relief for persons who have suffered harm from the wrongful acts of others.

That is quite clear and right when causation is established by the courts.

No argument there.

However in the case of Psychiatric evaluations, we, the lay people, cannot convince ourselves that the law, in these cases can differentiate the "wheat" from the "chaff".

No disrespect to the Law you understand and we, the laity, cannot think of a better system.
That's what lawyers call an evidential problem not a legal one, Sqad. The law is easy enough but what any judge deciding fact believes or doesn't believe proved, and what conclusions are drawn from any evidence, expert or otherwise, are a matter of human nature, reason, and understanding
Fred....LOL.....;-).......I knew there would be an answer.
And often the victim's partner needs counselling as well. It can be very hard to come to terms with the fact that your wife was abused as a child or young woman, or your husband for that matter - boys are abused too.
Anagram,. I don't think any INNOCENT old men are worrying about having put their arm around a youngster years ago, and thinking it may be misconstrued years later. Any old man who is sitting there worrying that something he's done in the past is going to catch up with him, is a guilty old man.
if you read a list of the charges, which he has admitted, this would be construed as sexual assault, whether then or now. why some continue on about the money, seem to miss the point entirely. That this man used his status, celebrity to lure often very girls and committed acts of indecency on them, against their will. The woman featured in the paper was offended, very upset by it, but chose not to pursue the matter years ago, because of what her father had told her, that they were nobodies and he was a somebody, a star, so who is going to believe a child? There is a lot of truth in that, particularly when you consider the time these events happened. Some get over it, some do not, to constantly assert that they are only after the money beggars belief. We have seen with the horrendous Jimmy Savile case and endless Catholic priests who abused their charges that many children won't be believed even if they did tell the authorities at the time. I for one think that the authorities will weed out those with no case to answer, and that those brave enough to come forward now, will at least perhaps get their day in court.
Well whatever happens, Stuart Hall's life (however long he has left) is now down the pan, but maybe he should have comnsidered that when he was abusing young women throughout his career. I have no sympathy for him whatsoever, none.
chapta, neither do i.
Be very interesting to see how many of the others who have been named, but strongly protest their innocence, will be found guilty, or eventually confess !
time will tell, i hope those who have been abused by him or anyone else, get closure...
Same here em.
A big noise is being made about the fact he has signed over his house to his wife. This is the only thing he has done right, why should his poor wife have to suffer the possibility of losing her home for what he has done years previously...........
chaptazbru //but maybe he should have considered that when he was abusing young women throughout his career// I think it would be wise to be careful what you say in public, as he has not been tried and found guilty.
Khandro, he's pleaded guilty.
But, he's confessed !!!!
Sorry, I wasn't aware.
chapta...neither do I, but I am slightly concerned about where the compensation is going to come from. If it comes from Hall's own pocket, than I can't see a problem, but should the public purse, ie taxation pay out ?
It will be Hall that pays.
The house was joint,
so he has only transferred half the title.

The teleg seemed to have got hold of [a copy] of the deed of assignment.

61 to 80 of 88rss feed

First Previous 1 2 3 4 5 Next Last

Do you know the answer?

Tuart Hall To Be Sued - What A Surprise

Answer Question >>

Related Questions

Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.