Question Author
Feeugh! Reading your link, Buenchico, the guy seems intelligent enough, but a bit self-important in that he is basking in the glory (albeit negative) of "causing a stir". Also, there are snippets of what could be perceived as truth in what he says (e.g. "The mainstream media is the sole reason for Trump’s victory. They ignored the public.") and he uses these snippets to give credence to the rest of the tripe that he comes out with. A fascinating character study, he understands the appeal that the dramatic and the sensationalist explanation holds for people who won't or can't take time to learn and weigh up the facts. I can't make up my mind if I would like him or not. Probably not, although I would find him fascinating to listen to. He definitely would not like me, though. Thanks for posting the link.