Donate SIGN UP

Television Clear Out

Avatar Image
choux | 12:15 Mon 29th May 2023 | Film, Media & TV
15 Answers
I wouldn't put this down to "wokeism".
This Morning - no need to say more.
Escape To The Chateau - Ch4 have cut ties with Mr & Mrs Strawbridge.
Inside The Factory - no more Greg Wallace, though he continues with Masterchef.

Hope the trash can can accommodate the dreadfully false Britain's Got Talent/The X Factor, (anything with Simon Cowell in it).

Elsewhere, and for health reasons, Jeremy Paxman bows out of University Challenge this evening, I wish him well.

Have you suggestions as to other programmes now "beyond the pale"?

Gravatar

Answers

1 to 15 of 15rss feed

Best Answer

No best answer has yet been selected by choux. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.

For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
The Apprentice
BGT
There are many programmes I consider 'beyond the pale' but I choose not to watch them. I stopped watching Escape to the Chateau after the first couple of series, simply through boredom. Apart from University Challenge I haven't watched any of the programmes you mentioned.

One programme I would like to see the BBC ditch is Mrs Brown's Boys simply because it is pure rubbish. It's been running far too long.
An endless supply of new format quiz shows with a celebrity presenter.
I see Gary Lineker has one now.
The term "each to his own" springs to mind. Nobody is forced to watch any TV show. Like Barry I enjoy University Challenge and also enjoy Only Connect. Mrs Brown's Boys - SHUDDER - but I have a friend who loves it.
Cookery programmes. Love Island ,Naked Attraction, The Apprentice,
As above, there are many shows that I dislike...and I choose not to watch them. However, I accept that people have different tastes...and TV should be for everyone, no matter what their tastes.
Television formats and individual programmes and series are formulated and dictated by public interest.

For the commercial channel, this depends entirely on audience numbers, which attract and drive advertising revenue, so their output is necessarily 'lowest common denominator' in large areas, to attract the largest numbers.

But the medium has always been driven by the wants of its audiences, and it always will, because that is how the system works.

The BBC, government funded, has the luxury of a more cerebral approach, and can offer output that is niche in appeal, but fulfills their charter remit to 'Educate, inform, and entertain'.

Television will remain viewer-led because that is the system that drives it, with no sign of changing anytime soon.

If enough people stop watching, a programme/series/format will be dropped/altered/ updated, depending on the ideas of the programme makers.

The only way to deal with this is simply be selective - enjoy the programmes you like, ignore the ones you don't.

You'll be using the system that drives television, and always has - if it's not popular, it won't stay.
I enjoyed Escape to the Chateau for years, it just became a bit samey. It's also a shame that it's ended with a hint of nastiness.
I don't bother with 99% of the other programmes mentioned, though I do watch some cookery programs...because I enjoy food and seeing how inventive people can be.
They're all a "set-up". They want viewers to think it's random, when it's nothing of the sort.
Strictly, Strictly, STRICTLY!
If we have to keep Strictly, can we get rid of useless Tess Daley and the Claudia fringed woman? Also if we have to keep BGT can we please get rid of Holden and Dixon? Haaa haaa haaa. Yuk.
How do they know who is watching what? What really pees me off is the 'warning' before Corrie or Emmerdale that it may contain scenes some viewers find upsetting - its not on the occasional car crash episode it on every time - whatever happened to being entertained?
Question Author
I know I have aged opinions but think tv companies are in the business of making profits above all else. I believe there are too many tv hours available to view which mean a lowering of standards. I realise some people are unable to watch tv for set hours, e.g. shift workers.

There is far too much gratuitous violence and sexual content leaves little to any imagination. I know the BBC's core is to inform, educate and entertain but surely not to incite with its share of violence, etc.?

I am selective over what I do view but massed, repetitive adverts bring other programmes to my screen. I pay my licence fee and subscribe to other tv services. This is my opinion which I don't expect others to share.
It's become a conduit to deliver the new world order.

Where there's yuck, there's brass.

1 to 15 of 15rss feed

Do you know the answer?

Television Clear Out

Answer Question >>