Crosswords15 mins ago
How Long Should Threads Last?
40 Answers
A day, a week?
The reason i ask, is i posted something on tuesday, it got 6 replies, and now its gone. So can i assume there has to be a minimum of interest, eg 20 or so replies for it to be around for several days?
The reason i ask, is i posted something on tuesday, it got 6 replies, and now its gone. So can i assume there has to be a minimum of interest, eg 20 or so replies for it to be around for several days?
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by piggynose. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.As Mamya said plus if it's vanished completely, it will have contravened Site Rules.
Threads remain on the site forever but they only appear in 'Latest posts' for a month. (They also only appear under the 'Most Recent' tab in any particular section of AB for a month but you can still access older threads by clicking on 'Answered' or by using the search box).
The only exceptions are where the member posting the question has been banned (which results in all of their contributions to the site disappearing) or where the Ed or a moderator has removed a thread for a breach of AB's rules (or possibly, even though the original post didn't break any rules, where there are lots of answers that create problems, e.g. where people repeatedly ignore the sub judice rules by discussing active court cases).
The only exceptions are where the member posting the question has been banned (which results in all of their contributions to the site disappearing) or where the Ed or a moderator has removed a thread for a breach of AB's rules (or possibly, even though the original post didn't break any rules, where there are lots of answers that create problems, e.g. where people repeatedly ignore the sub judice rules by discussing active court cases).
I might be in error but I seem to recall it was you who posted a Youtube video asking if there was possibly any truth in it.
If so, since you'd not actually promoted the (completely discredited) theories in it as being true yourself, I initially decided to leave the video online for people to make their own minds up (hopefully in conjunction with reading the links that people posted illustrating the total lack of esteem that the scientific community holds for the so-called 'expert' behind the video).
Later on though, I decided that it was inappropriate to leave an embedded link online to one of the many copies of that video that Youtube's own moderators had been deleting for many hours on end.
However, when I came to remove your thread myself, I found that another moderator had beaten me to it.
That was most definitely NOT an act of prejudice on my part (or, I'm sure, on the part of the moderator who actually removed your thread). It was simply because all mods have received an email from the Ed, asking us to ensure that this policy is actively enforced:
https:/ /www.th eanswer bank.co .uk/Cha tterBan k/Quest ion1700 018.htm l
If so, since you'd not actually promoted the (completely discredited) theories in it as being true yourself, I initially decided to leave the video online for people to make their own minds up (hopefully in conjunction with reading the links that people posted illustrating the total lack of esteem that the scientific community holds for the so-called 'expert' behind the video).
Later on though, I decided that it was inappropriate to leave an embedded link online to one of the many copies of that video that Youtube's own moderators had been deleting for many hours on end.
However, when I came to remove your thread myself, I found that another moderator had beaten me to it.
That was most definitely NOT an act of prejudice on my part (or, I'm sure, on the part of the moderator who actually removed your thread). It was simply because all mods have received an email from the Ed, asking us to ensure that this policy is actively enforced:
https:/