Dear Ed.

[Bewley_Bros]

Why?

[kempie]

Infringement of the Site Rules.

[WaldoMcFroog]

The only real 'why' is 'Why doesn't the Ed ban your IP address and get rid of you for good?'

[johnlambert]

two questions
1), what have you done to get banned now minter?
2) what are you going tro call yourself when you run out of david bowie references

[Bewley_Bros]

kempie, absolutely no infringements this time. Zero, zilch, none.

waldo, the fact I am not a pro-terrorist, criminal loving, work-shy peasant like yourself, surely gives me more right than you!

lambert, 1) answered above

2) few realise The Beach Boys are just as prominent in my little life, and I can draw many further references once Lord Bowie has been used up.

[johnlambert]

tut tut,
no wonder you have so few real or cyber friends

[Bewley_Bros]

There I was lambert thinking you had mellowed.

Perhaps I should meet a barely legal, slightly simple looking female to occupy my time.

Then again, perhaps I shouldn't.

[johnlambert]

hold on minter, i asked a simple non offensive question and you call me a a pro-terrorist, criminal loving, work-shy peasant?

[Bewley_Bros]

The fact this was prefixed by waldo, thus indicating I was answerring him, I fail to see where I have called you that same thing.

One thing I know we agree on Lambert, is our shared abhorrence for the terrorist!!!!!!!!!!!

[johnlambert]

my mistake, I thought that jibe was aimed at both Waldo and I
We agree on quite a lot of things in principle minter, as far as I can see, it's the manner we express those issues that causes some of the friction