Donate SIGN UP

Is 5 years enough for these scum ?

Avatar Image
vehelpfulguy | 09:03 Wed 10th May 2006 | News
13 Answers

These scum got only 4 years and 5 years in prison.


For 54 vicious offences


That makes it about one month for each offence, less for the 4 year sentence.


Disgraceful


http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/london/4755071.stm

Gravatar

Answers

1 to 13 of 13rss feed

Best Answer

No best answer has yet been selected by vehelpfulguy. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.

For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.

Blimey, how many more of these type of questions are going to get posted. Boring, boring, boring.

Spinchimp - this is the news section - what type of questions do you expect?


We are too frequently given reason to believe this country's Judicial system as a whole is disgraceful

Question about news, not questions which are actually chat and aimed at giving people the opprtunity of having an ill-informed rant.

No disrespect to vehelpfulguy, I agree entirely with his sentiments. But I think chimps point is that this is not a question, more of an opinion to create debate. Answerbank is littered with 'disgusted of London' type posts and although I am as guilty as anyone in joining in, all it succeeds in doing is creating arguments between the bleeding hearts and the hardliners, without any resolve. That's why they have become, as chimp so eloquently puts it, 'boring'.

Hmmm


It is true we have been here once or twice before haven't we?

In answer to the question..no, I don't think it is enough (now there's a surprise!)


Unfortunately there is nothing I can do to change the judicial system..& today I really don't feel like a rant.


I have been avoiding the anti-vivisection thread like the plague!

in answer to the original question, no it is not enough, nowhere near enough, that's why our prisons are full, the penalty should fit the crime, I won't go on, don't want to bore certain people.
jedda is it just me or are you suggesting that there'd be less people in prison if people got longer sentences?

No, he is saying that the punishment should fit the crime..meaning:


Murderers would be executed instead of imprisoned, leaving enough room in prisons for scumbags to serve longer sentences.


At least *I think* that's what jedda means!

Yes I am suggesting that, if one new from the first thought of , lets say a robbery that the minimum was say 5 years with additional time for carrying a weapon and additional time for using it and so on, and that a ten year sentence actually meant ten years then some might not get on that road. or can you suggest a way to halt the escallation in crime.
What escalation in crime?
JamesEverton, Where do you live then,on the moon?






jedda - where do you live then, in the Daily Mail?

1 to 13 of 13rss feed

Do you know the answer?

Is 5 years enough for these scum ?

Answer Question >>