AOG... well thanks for lumping me in with this woman... What I was trying to point out was that what she meant was different from how it's being interpreted. Beyond that I have no intentions of defending her, or of associating myself with that view. As it happens I completely disagree with the implicit "downgrading" of female-male sexism that's implicit in her choice of definition. So the rather pathetic attack is also totally misdirected.
Incidentally, if you meant me when you talked about the "head of the defence league", I was busy yesterday and never had a look at this thread -- assuming that the conversation was over. Apparently not, if you feel a need to lay into me for attempting to explain, but absolutely not excuse, another person's words.
OG -- people can accept or reject my explanation at their leisure, but it remains the correct interpretation of her use of "sexism". As far as I'm concerned, sexism means the same to me as it does to anyone else at AB, and it should stay that way. This woman has therefore, in my dictionary, been sexist and racist. All I am trying to say is that her dictionary is different, and you should use that one when interpreting her words.