Donate SIGN UP

Water

Avatar Image
chimney | 17:33 Tue 21st Mar 2006 | Science
9 Answers
When I was at school I was told that it is impossible to actually lose water as it is in a perpetual cycle of Evaporation/Condensation/Precipitation. If this is true why is there a water shortage?
Gravatar

Answers

1 to 9 of 9rss feed

Best Answer

No best answer has yet been selected by chimney. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.

For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
The water is somewhere it's just not here! The total amount of water is constant whether it's cloud, in the sea, in the rivers and lakes or even the Ice caps. There is never an actual shortages there is just a shortage where you want/need it.

It probably was true at the time, but climate changes - less rain, drier longer summers have meant that the subterrainian water table and reservoirs are seriously depleted, and continue so to be, so it's not true any more.


We haven't so much 'lost' water, as seen the cycle of evaporation / condensation / precipitation change, and for the worse.

It's all in the bottled water stacked everywhere I reckon .Also if the ice caps are melting shouldn't there be more water everywhere?


Anyway just my 2 pennyworth with tongue slightly in cheek....!

Are you the same chimney on gateworld?
Question Author

No i'm not the same chimney.


What's gateworld?

It's a stargate site
To put that into some kind of perspective, less than 1% of all the water in the Earth's water cycle is useable by us humans.

It's really a question supply and demand. At a steady state (inputs , the water cycle will maintain a relatively constant amount of fresh water in aquifers and surface water bodiesamount of water

Hmm, I don't know what happened. I really meant to say that it is really a matter of mass balance. As I was saying, at steady state (inputs=outputs), the volume of water stored in aquifers and surface water bodies will remain relatively constant. If inputs >outputs, then there will be an increase in water being stored. If output>inputs, then there will be a decrease in water being stored. When we are talking about water that can be used by humans, as stoo_pid pointed out, we are limited to relatively shallow groundwater and fresh surface water (rivers and lakes), which is a very small percentage of the total water budget. The main input is precipitation, and outputs include evapotranspiration (evaporation and transpiration by plants), runoff to the ocean via rivers, and human consumption (drinking water, agricultural uses, industrial uses, etc.). There is not a lot we can do about input to the system on a short term time scale. Whether or not we can effectively change the climate on a larger time scale is another discussion all together. As andy-hughes pointed out, some of the outputs are also effected by climate, but human usage is a very large output and is increasing as the population increases. Another effective output is water contamination, which has become a very serious problem world wide. I say it is an effective output because it causes a certain volume of water to be unusable by humans. Again, most water contamination is caused by humans. So I would say that the main cause of a water shortage is humans.

1 to 9 of 9rss feed

Do you know the answer?

Water

Answer Question >>