Donate SIGN UP
Home > News > Just a stupid teenage dispute??????

Just a stupid teenage dispute??????

Avatar Image
anotheoldgit | 15:57 Mon 05th Sep 2011 | News
13 Answers
http://www.dailymail....-jailed-18-years.html

/// Jonathan Polnay, prosecuting, had described the events as 'a stupid teenage dispute over some money that got way out of hand'.///

Is that how you would describe this vicious attack on a young 16 year old girl?

If the prosecutor considered this vile crime as just a "stupid teenage dispute", is it any wonder they got off with such a lenient sentence?
prev Further to the EDL bus incident.
  
next Should immigrant Britons be banned from representing GB in all sports?
Gravatar

Answers

1 to 13 of 13rss feed

Best Answer

No best answer has yet been selected by anotheoldgit. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.

For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
Avatar Image B00
H said one "that got out of hand" didn't he? So no, I don't think the prosecuter considered it a stupid teen dispute.
15:58 Mon 05th Sep 2011
Avatar Image emmie
what an arse, how do you reconcile what they did with that remark, i would give him a swift kick in the gonads.
16:00 Mon 05th Sep 2011
Avatar Image pa___ul3
that's sickening, and given that only two of them were teenagers that hardly stands up! The sentences should longer, it's also sexual assault and creation and distribution of child pornography.
16:02 Mon 05th Sep 2011
Avatar Image jackthehat
He didn't say that, at all.

He said that it "started off as a stupid teenage dispute over some money....."

No-one has said that what occurred subsequently wasn't dreadful.
16:03 Mon 05th Sep 2011
Avatar Image anotheoldgit
Question Author
B00

Can't quite see where you are coming from, did he not say "stupid teenage dispute"?

The reason for it in this instance is irrelevant.
16:09 Mon 05th Sep 2011
-- answer removed --
Avatar Image B00
both Triggs and Jack has said what I meant to, but far better. Teens do bicker, though I don't think the majority of the attackers can be classed as teens, but they luckily don't usually end as this one did!
16:14 Mon 05th Sep 2011
Avatar Image Gromit
He actually said it was a situation that got way out hand. It started over a £50 debt which was trivial. So the statement is 100% accurate.
17:24 Mon 05th Sep 2011
Avatar Image rojash
aog

Can't quite see where you are coming from, did he not say "that got way out of hand"?
20:56 Mon 05th Sep 2011
Avatar Image trt
Its a joke on their sentence, two people a few weeks ago were given the same sentence, 4 years for posting on the internet to join in a riot, theses scum were animals. Pity they couldn't be deported!
23:14 Mon 05th Sep 2011
Avatar Image ChuckFickens
LOL, I think the mist of righteous indignation must have blocked the second part of the sentence which puts the first part in context.
08:03 Tue 06th Sep 2011
Avatar Image sara3
it *was* a stupid teenage dispute at the start, and spiralled into this horrific attack. his point is that this shocking crime came out of something stupid.

no prosecutor would play this situation down. he/she is there to secure convictions.
08:10 Tue 06th Sep 2011
Avatar Image sandyRoe
I agree. The prosecution were setting the scene, explaining the circumstances, to the jury.
08:13 Tue 06th Sep 2011

1 to 13 of 13rss feed

Do you know the answer?

Just a stupid teenage dispute??????

Answer Question >>

Related Questions

Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.