ChatterBank7 mins ago
Vegetarian vs. Non-vegetarian
Why is it healthier to eat quorn or something like that rather than real meat?
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by Pelly8910. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
Yes Erin.. you see Joko refuses to tell us what point he is trying to make and then claims that he has won the argument which he also says is pointless. I think that somewhere way back he/she said that humans were never carnivores despite all the evidence to the contrary and claims that we are really almost herbivores despite all the evidence to the contrary. I think it is something to do with Joko being a vegetarian, though I can't quite see what that has got to do with anything. So if Joko wants to think he/she has won an argument then I am quite happy with that if it helps his/her self esteem to crow a little. It doesn't alter the facts though.
haha...oh. my. god.
i cannot believe that that is your grasp of this whole thread!
are you really that stupid??
like i said, you clearly haven't read any of it, and what you have read you havent understood, if thats your conclusion. I am astounded that you have such little capacity for comprehension.
i have 'won' as you call it, simply because you have yet to present any sort of counter argument whatsover on this matter...you still have not done that...
you just sound ignorant now....is english not your first language?
i cannot believe that that is your grasp of this whole thread!
are you really that stupid??
like i said, you clearly haven't read any of it, and what you have read you havent understood, if thats your conclusion. I am astounded that you have such little capacity for comprehension.
i have 'won' as you call it, simply because you have yet to present any sort of counter argument whatsover on this matter...you still have not done that...
you just sound ignorant now....is english not your first language?
OMG, what is it with you tonight. Why is every thread I go on using that word STUPID. I consider it very rude. and would be obliged if people didn't use it. To me it is tantamount to swearing. Could you please use a milder word, such as silly? I know this has nothing to do with your arguments but I think I am entitled to take offence at something I do not like.
Hi Joko, You are quite correct in that I haven't read the whole thread but then it is obvious that you haven't either. At least if you have read it you haven't understood much.There is a point that I would like to make, which is that English does happen to be my first language but not my only one. It may surprise you to know that I used to write and edit scientific reports written in English. I do have a good repertoire of insults in English but prefer not to use them as it is considered by civilised people to be impolite and disrespectful to insult others without due cause. So until you stop trying to communicate via your fundamental orifice and explain what you mean in plain English I cannot see any point in attempting to refute your irrefutable argument,whatever it is. ;-)
chakka...if you can give me the reasons you claim i am impervious to, then i will gladly hear them...as yet you haven't said anything at all that even remotely rebukes the theories i noted ...
come on, wheres all this evidence that relegate all ive said to the realms of flat earthists?
i am dying to hear them...unlike you, i welcome new information, and dont believe i just know it all already....but...i know you dont have any evidence...you dont even know what i have said, nor have you done any research, so how you can claim to have refuted anything is laughable...
remember, flat earthists were proved wrong, despite that being the theory that most people believed for centuries...they eventually accepted the notion of a globe even though it went against everything they thought they knew...
only an extremely arrogant person would join a discussion, having not read all previous posts or studied the subject even a bit and practically claim to be an authority on the subject...
at least my info comes from proper sources...and is not just 'what i reckon'...
until you yourself have something of substance to contribute you are hardly in a position to debate anything...if you want to debate a subject might i suggest you actually learn what it means...
come on, wheres all this evidence that relegate all ive said to the realms of flat earthists?
i am dying to hear them...unlike you, i welcome new information, and dont believe i just know it all already....but...i know you dont have any evidence...you dont even know what i have said, nor have you done any research, so how you can claim to have refuted anything is laughable...
remember, flat earthists were proved wrong, despite that being the theory that most people believed for centuries...they eventually accepted the notion of a globe even though it went against everything they thought they knew...
only an extremely arrogant person would join a discussion, having not read all previous posts or studied the subject even a bit and practically claim to be an authority on the subject...
at least my info comes from proper sources...and is not just 'what i reckon'...
until you yourself have something of substance to contribute you are hardly in a position to debate anything...if you want to debate a subject might i suggest you actually learn what it means...
