Sounds pretty reasonable to me.
The whole Climate Change theory (that man-made CO2 is the primary forcing agent for warming) is utter bunk. The whole Climate Change charade is about money and nothing more. People are making billions of dollars on ridiculous carbon trading schemes and other related nonsense. And it's not even based on measured, empirical science – it's based on computer models which attempt to model the Earth's entire climate (which is practically impossible given its inherent chaotic nature) based on inaccurate surface temperature readings from woefully inadequate, poorly sited and badly maintained Stevenson boxes (they can't use Satellite data as it shows that there has been no warming – so they must use the ground-based, 'Urban Heat Island Effect' skewed data).
When you get Professors such as Harold Lewis who is (or rather, was) Emeritus Professor of Physics at the University of California, Santa Barbara, resigning because he considers that that institution has been corrupted and debased by vast amounts of money that would abruptly stop if the University was anything other than a strong vocal supporter of the anthropogenic climate change theory, then any reasonable person would ask themselves why he holds that opinion.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Harold_Lewis
http://blogs.telegrap...seen-in-my-long-life/
And as an addendum, before certain people start to talk about 'trusting our great institutions such as the Royal Society', I would suggest that the