Donate SIGN UP

More Footie Nonsense!

Avatar Image
piggynose | 11:32 Sat 12th Aug 2023 | Sport
3 Answers
Can somebody tell me why Liverpool had to pay £111 million for a player whose won nothing as of yet. But only paid £35million for McAllister, a world cup winner!! ??
Am I missing something ?
Gravatar

Answers

1 to 3 of 3rss feed

Best Answer

No best answer has yet been selected by piggynose. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.

For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
If u mean Caicedo they haven’t paid anything for him yet.
What a player has won is largely irrelevant as it’s a team game and Caicedo plays for a team that don’t really win trophies
Am I missing something ?
yeah, missing the principles of pricing of footie transfers
hur hur hur

so - it will buy a hundred and ten thousand million feeds for Africa, who are spending all their food money on arms
so what?
er and keep watching
Question Author
11.41 so that's why, pp!

1 to 3 of 3rss feed

Do you know the answer?

More Footie Nonsense!

Answer Question >>

Related Questions

Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.