St Andrews Epworth - Creatures Quiz -...
Quizzes & Puzzles3 mins ago
Why Is A Convicted Murderer Not Forced To The Dock?
38 Answers
https:/
...gutless piece of slime should have been dragged up to the dock for sentencing. 42 years is not enough should have got whole life end of.
...gutless piece of slime should have been dragged up to the dock for sentencing. 42 years is not enough should have got whole life end of.
Answers
//Don't see why it matters// It matters because he should be forced to listen to not only the sentencing by the judge, but also the impact statement by, in this case, the poor girl's mother.
22:53 Mon 03rd Apr 2023
// One of the reasons for that is quite pragmatic - they have to fully vacate their cell and on their return may be provided with accommodation that may not suit them.//
A convicted criminal takes whatever's given, they gave up the right to be 'unsuited' with their free accommodation when they chose to be criminals. Maybe we need to adopt the American use of leg chains.
A convicted criminal takes whatever's given, they gave up the right to be 'unsuited' with their free accommodation when they chose to be criminals. Maybe we need to adopt the American use of leg chains.
he should be forced to listen...
no - listen is "hear with attention"
no evidence that he wd listen.... in fact he stated he wdnt.
sentencing hearing involves victim statements, and not just a bare "42 years" and it is clear that the victims and relation regard this as an impt part of the process.
anyway well done TTT all the low lives of whitehall ( the politicians that is!) have crawled onto the bandwagon
no - listen is "hear with attention"
no evidence that he wd listen.... in fact he stated he wdnt.
sentencing hearing involves victim statements, and not just a bare "42 years" and it is clear that the victims and relation regard this as an impt part of the process.
anyway well done TTT all the low lives of whitehall ( the politicians that is!) have crawled onto the bandwagon
An update;:
“Thomas Cashman: Renewed call to force criminals to attend sentencing”
https:/
“Thomas Cashman: Renewed call to force criminals to attend sentencing”
https:/
TCL \concurrent sentences for more serious offences\
Can someone please explain this point of law.
Cashman received a Life sentence with a 42 year minimum term for murder.
The judge in her summing up also handed down the following:
22 years for attempted murder.
18 years each for the 2 gun crimes.
10 years for wounding.
Making a total of 68 years to be serverd concurrently.
If Cashman was successful in a parole hearing after 42 years, how can he possibly serve the 68 years
which are running concurrently??
Can someone please explain this point of law.
Cashman received a Life sentence with a 42 year minimum term for murder.
The judge in her summing up also handed down the following:
22 years for attempted murder.
18 years each for the 2 gun crimes.
10 years for wounding.
Making a total of 68 years to be serverd concurrently.
If Cashman was successful in a parole hearing after 42 years, how can he possibly serve the 68 years
which are running concurrently??
>15.55
Atheist I understand that concurrent sentences are not consecutive. If I had my way all sentences would be consecutive.
It just seems that the judge in her summing up, had she not even mentioned the other crimes it would make no difference to the outcome of Cashman's overall time spent in jail.
Atheist I understand that concurrent sentences are not consecutive. If I had my way all sentences would be consecutive.
It just seems that the judge in her summing up, had she not even mentioned the other crimes it would make no difference to the outcome of Cashman's overall time spent in jail.
judgie-baby
retired judgie baby who clearly was NOT aware that prisoner doing porridge, if they refuse to come out of their cells, are forced to do so by a special team.
and mused how it wd be done
and how you keep him quiet in court ( you dont)
and how ( of course ) it wd upset the dignity of the court and the respect due to a judge ( like him) ( = make it into a circus)
Starmer says he thinks that years should be added to the sentence for refusal to attend
retired judgie baby who clearly was NOT aware that prisoner doing porridge, if they refuse to come out of their cells, are forced to do so by a special team.
and mused how it wd be done
and how you keep him quiet in court ( you dont)
and how ( of course ) it wd upset the dignity of the court and the respect due to a judge ( like him) ( = make it into a circus)
Starmer says he thinks that years should be added to the sentence for refusal to attend
Lybching is never justified
even in Ukraine or Russia
Lots of cases of POWs 1945 trying to lynch their cruel tormentors, and being prevented from doing so by their senior officers.
Alec Guiness ( bridge over the river kwai) did this - preventive detention, and the Japanese CO became a secret Christian. But that boys and girls is a difft story
even in Ukraine or Russia
Lots of cases of POWs 1945 trying to lynch their cruel tormentors, and being prevented from doing so by their senior officers.
Alec Guiness ( bridge over the river kwai) did this - preventive detention, and the Japanese CO became a secret Christian. But that boys and girls is a difft story
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.