Donate SIGN UP

Sajid Javid Orders Review Of Medical Device Racial Bias

Avatar Image
naomi24 | 11:20 Sun 21st Nov 2021 | News
75 Answers
//A review into whether medical devices are equally effective regardless of the patient's ethnicity has been ordered by Health Secretary Sajid Javid.

Research suggests oximeters, which are clipped to a person's finger, can overstate the level of oxygen in the blood of people from ethnic minorities.

Ministers want to know whether bias could have prevented patients receiving appropriate Covid treatment.

Mr Javid said any bias was "totally unacceptable". //

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-59363544

The word bias smacks of something quite deliberate which I'm certain isn't the case. Should Mr Javid et al choose their words more carefully? I think so.
Gravatar

Answers

61 to 75 of 75rss feed

First Previous 1 2 3 4

Avatar Image
Perhaps, instead of using the word 'bias' (which is open to misinterpretation), they ought to have said that oximeters are proving to be less effective on dark skin.
11:34 Sun 21st Nov 2021
Question Author
Everyone else, sp? You’re not paying attention.

1ozzy, the BA answers your question.
Question Author
SP, just out of interest in criticising potentially upsetting language what agenda do you think I’m pursuing?
Thanks Naomi
I'd like to thank Ken for offering "less effective "

Even though "bias" works.

Guess it depends on the interpretation of the word.
Should have come out in Sudan - or DRC innit
the oximeters always read low? if they did....

anyway seems to have gone quiet - the news caravan has moved on.....
what s in a word - - it is whether they have led to duff decisions.....
naomi24

No-one agrees with your statement:

"The word bias smacks of something quite deliberate" because everyone knows it not to be true.

Your agenda - to see complaints of bias as fallacious. In this case the Health Minister wants to establish whether there IS a bias.

Eminently sensible as everyone without an agenda can see.

Those who nitpick on semantics are missing the big picture, which is the health and wellbeing of people who might catch this dreadful disease.

naomi24

//You’re not paying attention.//

To your threads?

Not so much.
i have read conflicting reports
1) that o2 monitors read low on pigmented skin (also my experience)
2) that o2 monitors give a falsely high reading on pigmented skin meaning that people with darker pigments may have been refused treatment because their o2 sats were thought to be higher tha they were.
Can anyone clarify what SJ is saying?
Question Author
SP, //Those who nitpick on semantics are missing the big picture,... //

Indeed they are.

//...which is the health and wellbeing of people who might catch this dreadful disease.//

And that, as I have made abundantly clear, is my main concern. What a pity it isn't yours.
Bednobs, he is saying they "overstate", read too high, which is my experience as well as yours. I haven't -yet- seen anything saying otherwise.
naomi24

Nice one pixie374!!!
//And that, as I have made abundantly clear, is my main concern.//

LOL
Enjoy the rest of your day naomi24.
Question Author
Thank you, I’m
sure I shall, sp. Hope you get over your hiccups.

61 to 75 of 75rss feed

First Previous 1 2 3 4

Do you know the answer?

Sajid Javid Orders Review Of Medical Device Racial Bias

Answer Question >>

Related Questions

Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.