Donate SIGN UP

Lets Not Forget This Nutter

Avatar Image
tiggerblue10 | 16:10 Sat 09th Jan 2021 | News
6 Answers
...with a potentially powerful arsenal.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-55598880

What 'hostile forces' would the Biden administration use against him? Why is he making threats? Or is he just seeking attention?
Gravatar

Answers

1 to 6 of 6rss feed

Best Answer

No best answer has yet been selected by tiggerblue10. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.

For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
“ Analysts suggest Mr Kim's remarks are an effort to apply pressure on the incoming government, with Mr Biden set to be sworn in on 20 January.”

I’d say that’s right.
A reminder of another of Trump’s spectacular failures though this one is more excusable. It feels worse though as he talked it up so ridiculously.
wd that be Piers Corbyn
I think - seriously - homegrown American nutters are more of a threat at the moment.

Did you read the tweet from the military woman who was killed in the Capitol - when the incoming VP Harris laid out her plan for the first 100 days (masks, vacciness etc) the woman tweeted back - "No the **** you will not! No masks, no you, no Biden the kid raper, no vaccines...sit your fraudulent ass down…we the ppl *****!”

That's seriously deranged, and there are a lot like her

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2021/jan/09/ashli-babbitt-capitol-mob-trump-qanon-conspiracy-theory
"Why is he making threats?"

What threats is he making?

'General MacArthur, who headed the United Nations Command during the Korean War, wanted to drop “between 30 and 50 atomic bombs … strung across the neck of Manchuria” that would have “spread behind us … a belt of radioactive cobalt.' wikiP

Having nukes might, might stop him being couped against.
Luckily for kim, “Due to travel restrictions, this year the United States has had to organize the coup at home.” { ;0)

He knows Saddam, Gaddafi were destroyed for NOT having nukes and why Israel has nukes.
He’s threatening to expand his arsenal.
You don’t need to be a far left keyboard warrior to see that Kim and N Korea feel safer with nukes.
But there’s an obvious solution: and one which gets round the fact that he’s not actually safer at all. It’s to open up to the west or at least the civilised world.
But he, like Gaddafi, like Saddam, like Assad and all the other brutal family criminal enterprises, would have no further reason to justify their existence.
"He’s threatening to expand his arsenal... But there’s an obvious solution: and one which gets round the fact that he’s not actually safer at all. It’s to open up to the west or at least the civilised world."

Which country with nukes has never expanded its arsenal. { no 'threats' or 'pledges' needed }

Your "obvious solution" did not benefit this man

https://d.ibtimes.co.uk/en/full/177781/frame-grab-shows-former-libyan-leader-muammar-gaddafi-covered-blood-after-his-capture-ntc.jpg

1 to 6 of 6rss feed

Do you know the answer?

Lets Not Forget This Nutter

Answer Question >>

Related Questions

Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.