Tommy Robinson Against Child Grooming

TheDevil | 11:55 Fri 22nd Nov 2019 | Society & Culture

78 Answers

If Tommy Robinson was so concerned about child grooming, then why isn't he and his boys protesting against Prince Andrew and his connection to child groomer Jeffrey Epstein?

Immigration --> More Building, More Locally-Farmed Food

Self-Learning Experience

Answers

61 to 78 of 78

First Previous 1 2 3 4

Best Answer

No best answer has yet been selected by TheDevil. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.

For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.

Barmaid

He has not been accused of grooming.

pixie374

No, carry on... we are replying to what you are posting, that's all x

TheDevil

Question Author

Being referred to as a female sex organ in discussion is not something I wish to be involved with.

pixie374

Thedevil, I have just looked back- and I know nobody will believe this in a million years, I genuinely hadn't realised I had typed "spath". Must have just been in my mind already. Apologies for that x

pixie374

Neither did I know what it was supposed to mean!

TheDevil

Question Author

Barmaid - "He has not been accused of grooming."

I am sorry. You are of course correct.

It is Epstein who has been accused. My mistake entirely.

Zacs-Master

No he hasn't, he was accused of sex trafficking and conspiracy to engage in sex trafficking.

TheDevil

Question Author

Zacs-Master - "No he hasn't"

One of his victims has accused him of slowly grooming her.

" British victim of convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein has told for the first time how she was slowly groomed by him until she was completely vulnerable and defenceless. "

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2019/09/21/british-victim-sex-offender-jeffrey-epstein-speaks-ordeal/

jackthehat

Accusing someone of something is a different sort of animal than 'being accused in a legal sense'.
You need to sort out your terminology....

Zacs-Master

I think you need to define whether you expect TR to protest against Eppstien for what the girl has claimed (which I understand to be unsubstantiated) or, on a legal basis, which seems to be your original premis, otherwise you could be accused of moving the goalposts ever so slightly so you don't look too daft.

Ken4155

Just been arguing the toss about this case with my Aunt Lilly. She got in such a rage i just had to say, "Peace, Lilly." :-///

TheDevil

Question Author

Zacs-Master - "I think you need to define whether you expect TR to protest against Eppstien for what the girl has claimed or, on a legal basis"

I would not have thought that it would matter to Tommy Robinson if it was on a legal basis or not. I just thought that he would have had something to say on the matter. He didn't. I found that to be surprising.

Zacs-Master

Not many others do, apparently.

TheDevil

Question Author

That is fair enough. I can understand that.

andy-hughes

The Devil - // It seemed that when child grooming hits the news, so does Tommy Robinson.

This indicates that his main agenda was not helping vulnerable children. //

'Tommy Robinson's main agenda is self-publicity and aggrandisement under the guise of being a 'citizen journalist' which is a polite term for any numpty with a video camera, an internet connection, an over-developed sense of self-importance, and too much time on their hands.

'Tommy' picks is targets carefully, usually confining himself to entire racial and religious demographics, which are not actionable, and steers well clear of naming individuals, which are, so it's no surprise that he has swerved this particular situation.