Donate SIGN UP

Options

Avatar Image
Bazile | 18:33 Mon 11th Nov 2019 | Business & Finance
23 Answers
£ 15000 - Yearly payment
£ 36000 - one off lump sum

or

£ 13000 - Yearly payment
£ 65000 one off lump sum

Am i thinking correctly as follows-

If i chose the higher lump sum , i would receive £ 29000 more now ( but with a lower yearly payment )

The higher annual payment would be a difference of £ 2000 more , and it would take 14.5 years to get the extra £ 29000 i would get now

I don't know if i've asked the question i've got in my head

Is the above correct and what do you think is a better option - higher yearly payment or higher lump sum now ?
Gravatar

Answers

21 to 23 of 23rss feed

First Previous 1 2

Best Answer

No best answer has yet been selected by Bazile. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.

For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
If you invest the lump sums in an ISA ( which will take more than 1 year due to limit) the income will also be tax free. If you are married use can use your wife's allowance as well.
Anyway the first £1000 of interest pa is tax free for a basic rate tax payer so unless you took the maximum lump sum and put it in a high interest, non ISA, account, tax on interest probably wouldn't be a factor unless you already have savings
"What - you blew it ?"

No - on the advice of a financial adviser (experts eh!) I took out an insurance with-profits bond which performed very poorly.

21 to 23 of 23rss feed

First Previous 1 2

Do you know the answer?

Options

Answer Question >>