Donate SIGN UP

Answers

1 to 6 of 6rss feed

Best Answer

No best answer has yet been selected by anotheoldgit. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.

For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
Students invite all sorts of radicals to speak.

They just ban the ones they don't like.
Nothing new there.
Students have enquiring minds - as they should.

Just because someone speaks to you doesn't mean that you absorb, believe, and act on what they tell you.
Question Author
/// Just because someone speaks to you doesn't mean that you absorb, believe, and act on what they tell you. ///

I thought that was the whole idea of teaching establishments?
AOG - // I thought that was the whole idea of teaching establishments? //

It is - but guest speakers are just that - speakers, they are not there to educate students in the subjects they are studying, they are there to provide a point of view, which as I have said, does not have to be agreed with, absorbed, or acted on - unlike information from employed lecturers.

As I see it, the difference is perfectly clear.
Prisons as well AOG
and are you proposing to close them ?

perhaps slashing burning and closing down is not the only way forward to combat islamic radicalisation

1 to 6 of 6rss feed

Do you know the answer?

It Would Seem That Mosques Are Not The Only Venues Of Radicalisation?

Answer Question >>

Related Questions

Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.