It's not only an odd (and somewhat disturbing) thing for a Christian to say, it's not even accurate.
According to Elisabeth Förster-Nietzsche's biography (which is supported by other sources), Friedrich Nietzsche died after suffering a stroke while battling against pneumonia.
Ever since i read his famous words: " That which does not kill us makes us stronger." I was of the opinion that he was either, mad or bad. I see no reason to change my view.
In France, where Philosophy is part of every school's curriculum, Nietzsche is rightly admired for the genius which he undoubtedly was. With such wonderful observations as "Morality is the herd-instinct in the individual" he was never afraid to challenge the norms of society.
Blimey Wyz, your post wasn't there when I posted mine - and oops, I'm usually one of them. I'll get my coat. (Scurries off cackling insanely........ hee hee hee). :o)
The borderline between genius and madness is an indistinct line but I find that the vast majority of Nietzsche's writings not only make sense to me but they also provide me with a clarity of vision which I didn't have previously.
For example, one only has to look at the collective madness of anyone who believes in any form of god, to see the truth of this:
"Insanity in individuals is something rare - but in groups, parties, nations and epochs, it is the rule".
As a nihilist, SandyRoe, I have no belief whatsoever in any form of universal morality.
Moral codes are defined within individual societies and thus vary throughout eras and across geographical boundaries. (For example, sexual morality in ancient Rome was very different from that in modern western Europe which, in turn, is very different from that in many Islamic countries). To assume that the moral code of the society in which you live is necessarily the only valid code (or even the 'right' one) smacks of unquestioning arrogance.