Donate SIGN UP

A simple question.

Avatar Image
birdie1971 | 01:16 Mon 31st May 2010 | Religion & Spirituality
68 Answers
Completely hypothetical...

If it were 'proved' that God did not exist, would you feel that your life had no meaning?


(I don't want to get into a debate about what evidence would be necessary to disprove God, I simply want to know how people on AB would feel if the 'no God' hypothesis was somehow proven to be true).
Gravatar

Answers

1 to 20 of 68rss feed

1 2 3 4 Next Last

Best Answer

No best answer has yet been selected by birdie1971. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.

For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
I imaging AB people would continue living their lives as usual.
As I don't believe in God anyway, it wouldn't make any difference to me...
Question Author
MarkRae – My feelings exactly. But how do you rationalise it? You exist, but what's the point of you? What's the point of me? What's the point of anyone if God doesn't exist?

What's the point of 'being'?
What's the point of living if God did exist ?
Please dont get me started on 'whats the point of anyone'the way I am feeling at the moment.
Whats the point of......
doing the dishes?
Hoovering
Dusting
smoking
inventing
writing on here
Because we can.
Why should god get all the credit for what we are?
We are what we are because we can.
Or some may say why bother,whats the point
Depends on the mood
I do wonder why I am at the moment though,seem to do everything wrong......but maybe its because I can.
Sorry,rant over.Need a drink(or ten)
I am here as a result of the Big Bang and an incredibly fortuitous set of circumstances which allowed life to develop on this planet - cosmologists call it the Goldilocks effect.

You are asking me to try to attribute a theosophical meaning on this where, in my opinion, there is none to attribute.

As I don't believe that God exists, consequently I don't believe that my life needs to be described in terms of its relationship to him - that would be absurd.
Question Author
Canary42

“What's the point of living if God did exist?”


Well I suppose the point is to praise God isn't it? That's what all the 'big' religions say – praise God because that what He wants (Him being a little bit needy I presume)
Indeed so. If God is truly omnipotent as the major (Abrahamic and other) religions believe, then why does he need his creation to praise him? Zaphod Beeblebrox had an ego the size of a planet, but this is ridiculous!
Question Author
MarkRae – Lighten up Mark! I was being facetious!
Question Author
“... cosmologists call it the Goldilocks effect”

I know what you're referring to but if we're being accurate, it's actually called the Anthropic principle.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Goldilocks_planet

The anthropic principle states that observations of the physical universe must be compatible with life observed in it - that's not the same thing at all...
We are here and we have to deal with it and all the joy and despair it brings, we rarely try to work out why we are here, but rather why is this happening to me?
Question Author
How are they different when speaking about life on planet Earth? I fail to understand the discrepancy between the two descriptions. Please enlighten me.
The anthropic principle says that the universe must be described in terms of the life which is observed in it.

A Goldilocks planet is one which falls broadly into the same "type" as ours due to fortuitous coincidence in terms of its ability to support human life, e.g. just the right distance from its sun to make it the right temperature where liquid water exists, just the right amount of gravity, just the right length of day and year etc...
Question Author
MarkRae

The Goldilocks planet theory says, “It's just right here, aren't we lucky?”

The Anthropic principal says, “How come we're here? How can I ask that question given that I am standing on a planet that has an atmosphere and given the fact that I am a complex biological entity with the capacity for complex, rational, esoteric thought, etc.”

They are not the same thing.
> They are not the same thing.

Er, yes I know - I never said they were... Quite the reverse, in fact...
Well, I'd have to find another interest - but I would welcome the exposure of the biggest lie in the history of the world as man's greatest achievement and as cause for celebration! Who's for a party?
Count me in, naomi, and you know what my tipple is.
For me God does exist. However...if it were proved otherwise I reckon most would still live their lives as per normal...it's not only the hereafter that is a joyful thought...it's the "everyday" stiuff that makes it worthwhile.
MarkRae is right.
The Goldilocks effect notices that on that planet the 'porridge' (the conditions we need for life) is too 'hot' (not suitable); on that planet it is too 'cold' (unsuitable for different reasons). On earth the porridge is just right, which is why we are here.

The anthropic 'principle' (too dignified a term for it) comes dangerously near to saying that because conditions on earth ARE so right, they must have been designed that way to make sure we can exist. That is nonsense, of course. If they were different we simply wouldn't exist: either a different form of life would exist or no life at all.

Since I am already happy that gods don't exist, my life wouldn't change one jot if it were proved. And God must be a very conceited fellow to imagine that I would think my life pointless thereafter. I also got over realising that there is no Tooth Fairy or Easter Bunny.

1 to 20 of 68rss feed

1 2 3 4 Next Last

Do you know the answer?

A simple question.

Answer Question >>