Quizzes & Puzzles1 min ago
Everything . . .
72 Answers
any (other) questions?
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by mibn2cweus. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
Stephen Hawking said that as long as there was a law of gravity, the universe can and will create itself.
That is poor philosophy.
Laws describe the interaction between entities, but are nothing in themselves.
Gravity describes the bending of space caused by the presence of mass.
Hawking, like other New Atheists, cling to their materialistic worldview, that dictates that the universe contains within it, the means for it own creation.
Al Khalili does not conclude his lecture with a plausible beginning, but assumes a vacuum full of Zero Point Energy, (ZPE), that lends itself to the brief formation of virtual particles and anti particles that go on to annhialate themselves.
But that would conclude of space and energy being past eternal, and we know that the universe had a beginning 13.7 billion years ago, when space itself was created, along with energy, so he is far from accurate in his assumptions.
There is nothing in his lectures to nullify the truth of the creation account in the Bible.
That is poor philosophy.
Laws describe the interaction between entities, but are nothing in themselves.
Gravity describes the bending of space caused by the presence of mass.
Hawking, like other New Atheists, cling to their materialistic worldview, that dictates that the universe contains within it, the means for it own creation.
Al Khalili does not conclude his lecture with a plausible beginning, but assumes a vacuum full of Zero Point Energy, (ZPE), that lends itself to the brief formation of virtual particles and anti particles that go on to annhialate themselves.
But that would conclude of space and energy being past eternal, and we know that the universe had a beginning 13.7 billion years ago, when space itself was created, along with energy, so he is far from accurate in his assumptions.
There is nothing in his lectures to nullify the truth of the creation account in the Bible.
Theland, this isn’t about me so please stop making everything personal as you do. This is about your failure to offer supporting evidence for your theory. All you ever do is dismiss any other theory and say God did it - but you never say how or why - or even who or what or where God was when he did it.
Theland, I haven’t ignored its content. All you do is dismiss science but you never give good reason for claiming that God is responsible. It’s reminiscent of Labour voters here pulling the Conservative party to bits. They never actually tell us why we should vote Labour but they want us to all the same.
Oh no! Theland has taken to ‘doing a Khandro’! Abandoning his own reasoning in favour of the word of people he thinks should influence us with their godly deliberations. Why do you think any man knows more than another on the subject of an unknown, unseen, and unproven God, Theland? You insult your own intelligence - along with ours.
Naomi - According to your materialistic worldview, the answers are all contained within the material universe.
Please do not make demands that I answer your questions.
This is not a courtroom, and you are not a cross examining barrister. And I am not a trained poodle to come to heel when you snap your fingers.
Please do not make demands that I answer your questions.
This is not a courtroom, and you are not a cross examining barrister. And I am not a trained poodle to come to heel when you snap your fingers.
