Jokes10 mins ago
Do You Know Why Jehovah’S Witnesses Don’T Take Blood?
49 Answers
In a previous thread it was said “it was cowardly & despicable” because the suggestion was made to ask a JW when they call why they don’t accept blood. Well, this question can be answered but do you Really know why it is they don’t take blood!
I would appreciate it if answers were serious and not ridiculous. Any that are mocking and ridicule will not receive a response.
I would appreciate it if answers were serious and not ridiculous. Any that are mocking and ridicule will not receive a response.
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by goodlife. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.I know! I know! It's because you've all been told not to by an article in a magazine, and if tomorrow you were told that it was actually now allowed because of some new 'interpretation' then you would 'take blood'.
This answer is serious (and also correct) and I'd be interested in your feelings about it.
This answer is serious (and also correct) and I'd be interested in your feelings about it.
Goodlife - “Do You Know Why Jehovah’S Witnesses Don’T Take Blood?”
Yes.
They have been convinced by their church that to do so is a sin. They have swallowed hook, line and sinker the ludicrous notion that certain modern medical practices which have been proven time and time again to save lives are an affront to God.
The arguments you present as to why “blood is not the best medicine” are simplistic in the extreme and largely inaccurate. Do yourself a favour and educate yourself about the life-saving benefits of blood transfusions from a source not connected to your church. You are reading and repeating distorted and highly questionable material that costs real people their very real lives.
Yes.
They have been convinced by their church that to do so is a sin. They have swallowed hook, line and sinker the ludicrous notion that certain modern medical practices which have been proven time and time again to save lives are an affront to God.
The arguments you present as to why “blood is not the best medicine” are simplistic in the extreme and largely inaccurate. Do yourself a favour and educate yourself about the life-saving benefits of blood transfusions from a source not connected to your church. You are reading and repeating distorted and highly questionable material that costs real people their very real lives.
My experience similar to Mamya's
My blood transfusion meant that:-
I didn't die from a severe post partum haemorrhage at age 37 leaving a husband
I also went on to have another son
I am now in my late 60s and Mr YS and I were blood donors until forced to give up for medical reasons (one being the above transfusion for me) but now younger son regular blood donor and that's brilliant.
My blood transfusion meant that:-
I didn't die from a severe post partum haemorrhage at age 37 leaving a husband
I also went on to have another son
I am now in my late 60s and Mr YS and I were blood donors until forced to give up for medical reasons (one being the above transfusion for me) but now younger son regular blood donor and that's brilliant.
It would be genuinely interesting to hear what Goodlife has to say about yogasun's and Mamyalynne's continued existence due to life-saving blood transfusions. I can only assume that if Goodlife and his anti-scientific church had their way, these two individuals would be pushing up the daisies.
Care to comment Goodlife?
Care to comment Goodlife?
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.