More cut and paste responses from Goodlife.
You can find an almost identical response, including the biblical reference, here
http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20120709190731AA4RPmL
( you might need to scroll through the responses a bit)
At least the person who offered that response had the decency to source his quotations, unlike Goodlife.
I think what irritates me most is that, naive person that I am ,I was once impressed with the level of bibilical scholarship that posters such as Truthabounds and even Goodlife appeared to represeent, with their biblical quotations and references.
It was only after reading a few of their stock questions and responses to critiques that I realised that it was all unattributed cut and paste verbiage. Many of them were even so ashamed of what they were that they refused to acknowledge which religion they belonged to.
I wish to see original content. I want to see individual argument. Where you think that a site or organisation has made the point better, thats OK - but just link to the page, so the reader can see the context, and the author gets the attribution.
What we get instead is stock questions, coupled with stock answers - followers who offer verbiage by rote, with little or no thought associated.